Current and potential geographical distribution of white balsum Heliocarpus americanus L. in the department of Nariño

Authors

  • Tulio César Lagos B.
  • Héctor Ordoñez J.
  • Alvaro Castillo M.
  • Jorge Fernando Navia E.
  • Liz Katherine Lagos S.
  • Carlos Benavides C.
  • Danita Andrade D.
  • David Esteban Duarte A.
  • Dalia Julieth López G.

Keywords:

Geographical distribution, H. americanus, probability, georeferencing.

Abstract

This investigation was designed to establish the geographical distribution of H.americanus in the department of Nariño, from georeferencing information analysis and identification of possible bioclimate zones where the species is found. Nineteen climate parameters and the known distribution of the species were evaluated, obtained by georeferencing174 sites in 15 municipalities of the department of Nariño. The most likely distribution of the species is found at altitudes between 1350 and 2550 meters. There are three climate distribution groups: group one with 148 points, group two with 21 points, and group three with five points. The three groups are similar in terms ofhumidity. We obtained a 90% chance of having suitable environmentsfor this species along the Andes mountain range, which shows suitable climate zones for the species’ development. In addition, there are small areas where its distribution has lost continuity, creating isolated populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ÁLVAREZ, G. 2004. Vegetación del territorio CAR, 450 especies de sus llanuras y montañas. Editorial Panamericana. Cundinamarca - Colombia. 871 p.

ANDERSON, R., LEW, D. y ATOWNSEND, P. 2003. Evaluating predictive models of especies distribution: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecological Modelling. 162:211 - 232.

ANDERSON, R., y MARTINEZ-MEYER E. 2004. Modeling species geographic distributions for preliminary conservation assessments: an implementation with the spiny pocket mice (Heteromys) of Ecuador. Biological Conservation. 116(2):167 - 179.

AROCA, A. y MONTILLA, D. 2006. Evaluación de la propagación vegetativa del Balso blanco Heliocarpus americanus H.B.K. en la vereda la Merced, municipio de La Unión departamento de Nariño. Ingeniería Agroforestal. Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad de Nariño, Pasto. 77 p.

BERGER, J., ABBO, J., y TURNER, N. 2003. Ecogeography of annual wild cicer species. The poor state of the world collection. Crop Science. 43(2):1076 - 1090.

GROOM, M., MEFFE, C. y CARROLL, R. 2006. Principles of conservation biology, 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts. 600 p.

INSTITUTO GEOGRAFICO AGUSTIN CODAZZI (IGAC). 2012. Servicio al Ciudadano. Disponible en: http://www.igac.gov.co/igac. Consulta: junio, 2013.

LÓPEZ, J. y OSORIO, G. 2003. Evaluación y conservación de las especies aglutinantes o floculantes utilizadas en la agroindustria panelera de los municipios situados en jurisdicción de Corantioquia. Rev. Fac. Nal. Agr. Medellín vol.59 no.2. Corpoica, Medellín. 77 p.

NAOKI, K., GÓMEZ, I., LÓPEZ, P., MENESES, R., y VARGAS, J. 2006. Comparación de modelos de distribución de especies para predecir la distribución potencial de vida silvestre en Bolivia. Ecología en Bolivia, La Paz, Bolivia. 41(1):65 - 78.

NIX, H., 1986. A Biogeographic Analysis of Australian Elapid snakes. In: Longmore, R. (Ed.), Snakes: Atlas of Elapid snakes of Australia. Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Canberra. 4 - 10.

ORGANIZACIÓN PARA LA EDUCACIÓN Y PROTECCIÓN ANIMAL (OpEPA). 2013. Balso Blanco Heliocarpus americanus. Disponible en: http://www.opepa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=573&Itemid=30. Consulta: agosto, 2013.

PEARSON, R. y DAWSON, T. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12:361 - 371.

PHILLIPS, S., DUDIK, M. y SCHAPIRE, R. 2004. A maximum entropy approach to species Distribution modeling. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning. 655 - 662 p.

PHILLIPS, S., DUDIK, M. y SCHAPIRE, R. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190:231 - 259.

PHILLIPS, S. y DUDIK, M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent. New extensions & a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 31:161 - 175.

ROBERT, J., GUARINO, L., BUSSINK, C., MATHUR, P., CRUZ, M., BARRANTES, I. y ROJAS, E. 2009. Sistema de Información Geográfica para el Análisis de Datos de Distribución de Especies. DIVA-GIS. Univesirty of California.

SOBERÓN, J., y PETERSON, A. 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics. 2:1 - 10.

VÁSQUEZ, C., URIBE, A. y ÁLVAREZ, J. 2006. Propagación por estacas juveniles de Balso Blanco (Heliocarpus americanus L. Sin. H. popayanensis) utilizando propagadores de sub-irrigación. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. 59(2):3479 - 3498.

VILLASEÑOR, J. y TELLEZ-VALDES, O. 2004. Distribución Potencial del Género Jefea (Asteraceae) en México. Anales del Instituto de Biología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Serie Botánica. 75(2):205 - 220.

Published

2014-04-02

How to Cite

Lagos B., T. C., Ordoñez J., H., Castillo M., A., Navia E., J. F., Lagos S., L. K., Benavides C., C., Andrade D., D., Duarte A., D. E., & López G., D. J. (2014). Current and potential geographical distribution of white balsum Heliocarpus americanus L. in the department of Nariño. Revista De Ciencias Agrícolas, 30(2), 45–59. Retrieved from https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rfacia/article/view/1674