Interpretación sobre las Ciencias Sociales y Humanas en el Siglo XXI

Abstract

This article proposes an analysis of Consilience from a heterological approach between the human sciences and the natural sciences, which present an interpretive perspective established as the notion of the Not-All.

Interdisciplinarity starts from a critical and qualitative approach, by understanding theories as a process of argumentation, generating certain changes in the taxonomic categories of revolutionary paradigms and categorical closures to avoid misinterpretation of transdisciplinarity, properly applying its method. , without falling into false levels of theorizing as has happened today with ideology, which is alien to the philosophical and scientific investigation of the Hegelian Absolute Knowledge. The critique of Brockman’s reductivist Consilience allows us to manage a dialogical relationship between the sciences, prevents the management of universal complementarity, consolidates the epistemic self as intersubjetive and recognizes the subject in its ontological incompleteness.