contadores
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Research Article

Vol. 43 No. 2 (2026): Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas - May - August 2026

Machine learning–assisted early selectition of S1 segregants in strawberry, Fragaria × ananassa Duch

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.2026432.304
Submitted
February 8, 2026
Published
2026-08-11

Abstract

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) breeding requires analytical tools that integrate productivity and fruit quality in highly variable segregating populations. This study evaluated the integration of mixed models and machine learning algorithms to support early selection of S1 genotypes with high yield potential and fruit quality. A total of 320 genotypes were evaluated under an augmented block design for phenological, vegetative, productive, and fruit quality traits. Broad-sense heritabilities and predicted genetic values were estimated using mixed models and integrated with predictions from XGBoost and CatBoost. Moderate to high heritabilities were observed for structural and productive traits (H² = 0.52–0.86). Positive genetic correlations were found between fruit number and yield, whereas soluble solids content was negatively associated with yield components, indicating trade-offs between productivity and fruit quality. XGBoost showed high predictive accuracy for commercial yield (R² = 0.908), intermediate performance for fruit weight (R² = 0.461), and poor performance for soluble solids content as a continuous variable (R² = −0.096). Recoding soluble solids content into categorical classes improved interpretability, although class discrimination remained limited. Selection indices based on best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs), machine learning predictions, and their combination produced consistent rankings and identified genotypes with balanced agronomic and quality performance. Integrating mixed models and machine learning into multivariate selection indices provides a useful strategy for improving early selection efficiency in strawberry breeding programs.

References

  1. Acuña Caita, J. F., & Fischer Gebauer, G. (2024). Fresa (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.): manual de recomendaciones técnicas para su cultivo en el departamento de Cundinamarca. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86761
  2. Red de información y comunicación del sector agropecuario colombiano (AGRONET) (2025). Reporte: Área, Producción y Rendimiento Nacional por Cultivo Fresa. https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx?cod=1
  3. Al-Taai, S. R., Azize, N. M., Thoeny, Z. A., Imran, H., Bernardo, L. F. A., & Al-Khafaji, Z. (2023). XGBoost Prediction Model Optimized with Bayesian for the Compressive Strength of Eco-Friendly Concrete Containing Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Recycled Coarse Aggregate. Applied Sciences, 13(15), 8889. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158889
  4. Altieri, G., Curcio, D., Lepore, A., Grobler, E., Maffia, A., Gargano, N., Tedesco, A., Graziano, M. L., Mazzei, P., Capocasa, F., Mezzetti, B., & Celano, G. (2025). Yield and quality of new strawberry advanced breeding selections and commercial cultivars, grown under warm-temperate climatic conditions. Agriculture, 15(13), 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15131406
  5. Apostolopoulos, I. D., Tzani, M., & Aznaouridis, S. I. (2023). A General machine learning model for assessing fruit quality using deep image features. AI. 4, 812–830. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai4040041
  6. Brasileiro, B. P., Marinho, C. D., Costa, P. M. de A., Cruz, C. D., Peternelli, L. A. & Barbosa, M. H. P. (2015). Selection in sugarcane families with artificial neural networks. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 15(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332015v15n2a14
  7. Bernardo, R. (2020). Reinventing quantitative genetics for plant breeding: something old, something new, something borrowed, something BLUE. Heredity, 125, 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-020-0312-1
  8. Chandler, C. K., Folta, K., Dale, A., Whitaker, V. M., & Herrington, M. (2012). Strawberry. In: M., Badenes, D. Byrne, (eds) Fruit Breeding. Handbook of Plant Breeding, vol 8. Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0763-9_9
  9. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321–357. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953
  10. Chen, T. Q., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 13-17, 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
  11. Chen, Q., Li, J., Feng, J., & Qian, J. (2024). Dynamic comprehensive quality assessment of post-harvest grape in different transportation chains using SAHP–CatBoost machine learning, Food Quality and Safety, 8, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyae007
  12. Falconer, D. & Mackay, T. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 464p.
  13. Federer, W. T., & Raghavarao, D. (1975). On augmented designs. Biometrics, 31(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529707
  14. Friedman, J. (2001). Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189-1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451
  15. Gutiérrez-Esquivel, D., & Ruíz-Rivas, M. (2025). Cultivares híbridos como herramienta de mejoramiento genético en fresa: Híbridos en el mejoramiento genético de fresa. Revista C+TEC. 4, 30-35. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=10304665
  16. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R, (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. 607p.
  17. Jones, D., Fornarelli, R., Derbyshire, M., Gibberd, M., Barker, K., & Hane, J. (2023). The pursuit of genetic gain in agricultural crops through the application of machine learning to genomic prediction. Frontiers in Genetics, 14, 1186782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1186782
  18. Khatibi, S. M. H., & Ali, J. (2024) Harnessing the power of machine learning for crop improvement and sustainable production. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1417912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1417912
  19. Lin, F., Chen, D., Liu, C., & He, J. (2024). Non-Destructive detection of golden passion fruit quality based on dielectric characteristics. Applied Sciences, 14(5), 2200. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052200
  20. M’hamdi, O., Takács, S., Palotás, G., Ilahy, R., Helyes, L., & Pék, Z. A. (2024). A Comparative analysis of XGBoost and neural network models for predicting some tomato fruit quality traits from environmental and meteorological data. Plants, 13(5), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050746
  21. Newerli-Guz, J., Śmiechowska, M., Drzewiecka, A., & Tylingo, R. (2023). Bioactive ingredients with health-promoting properties of strawberry fruit (Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne). Molecules, 28(6), 2711. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062711
  22. Powers, D. M. W. (2011) Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to Roc, Informedness, Markedness & Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2, 37-63. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.16061
  23. Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A. V., & Gulin, A. (2018). Catboost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montréal, 3-8, 6639-6649. https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2018/file/14491b756b3a51daac41c24863285549-Paper.pdf
  24. Şimşek, Ö. (2024). Machine learning offers insights into the impact of in vitro drought stress on strawberry cultivars. Agriculture, 14(2), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14020294
  25. Sturzeanu, M., Hera, O., Militaru, M., & Vîjan, L. E. (2025). Improving strawberry fruit quality through breeding: cultivar performance and biochemical diversity. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 53(3), 14704. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha53314704
  26. Sturzeanu, M., & Hera, O. (2019). Variability and heritability for yield and fruit weigh traits of F1 strawberry hybrids. Fruit Growing Research, 35, 13-16. https://doi.org/10.33045/fgr.v35.2019.02
  27. Takahashi, M., Kawasaki, Y., Naito, H., Lee, U., & Yoshi, K. (2025) Fruit size prediction of tomato cultivars using machine learning algorithms. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16, 1516255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1516255
  28. Tong, H., & Nikoloski, Z. (2021). Machine Learning approaches for crop improvement: Leveraging phenotypic and genotypic big data. Journal of Plant Physiology, 257, 153354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153354
  29. Vieira, S. D., de Souza, D. C., Martins, I. A., Ribeiro, G. H. M. R., Resende, L. V., Ferraz, A. K. L., Galvão, A. G., & de Resende, J. T. V. (2017). Selection of experimental strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) hybrids based on selection indices. Genetics and Molecular Research, 16(1), gmr16019052. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/gmr16019052
  30. Zareei, E., Karami, F., Aryal, R., & Saed-Moucheshi, A. (2023). Genotypic by phenotypic interaction affects the heritability and relationship among quantity and quality traits of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 51(4), 594–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2022.2039725
  31. Zeist, A. R., & Resende, J. T. V. (2019). Strawberry breeding in Brazil: current momentum and perspectives. Horticultura Brasileira, 37, 007-016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-053620190101
  32. Zystro, J., Colley, M., & Dawson, J. (2018). Alternative Experimental Designs for Plant Breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews, 42, 87–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119521358.ch3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.