Quantification of carbon capture in different soil uses

Keywords: Agroforestry, monoculture, organic, carbon, interaction


Carbon sequestration by soils in different production systems contributes greatly to the reduction of greenhouse gases. The objective of this study was to quantify the carbon stored in four land uses (fodder banks, potato, live fences and pastures) at different depths (30 and 60 cm). To this end, a design of Complete Random Blocks (CABs) was made with a bifactorial arrangement, Factor A: land uses (natural pastures, live fences, fodder banks and potato cultivation) and Factor B: two depths (30 and 60 cm), with three replications.  To determine the percentage of carbon in the soil, complete soil samples were taken at the different depths and taken to the laboratory for analysis. As a result, marginal significant differences were found in soil uses (Pr > F= 0.0573); between the depths of 30 and 60 cm significant differences were found (Pr > F= 0.0061). However, no statistically significant differences were found in land use interaction by depth (Pr > F= 0.0659). The fodder bank presented a higher organic carbon content (139.85 tC.ha-1) at 60 cm depth and the potato monoculture (63.32 tC.ha-1) at 30 cm depth while, at both depths, natural pasture reported lower values (54.45 and 60.02 tC.ha-1). Hence, the importance of productive systems to accumulate more carbon at greater depths of soil (60 cm) compared to lower depths (30 cm), which may be linked to management practices that are made on the top layers of the soil, generating carbon leakage.


Download data is not yet available.


Agudelo, M. (2016). Growth and productivity of Agroforestry Systems (SAF) with cocoa in early stages of development in the tropical dry forest (bs-T) of the department of Antioquia. National University of Colombia, 104.

Agustín Codazzi Geographic Institute. (IGAC). (1979). Analytical methods of the soil laboratory. 4° ed. Bogotá, Colombia. 70 p.

Andrade, H. & Ibrahim, M. (2003) How to monitor carbon sequestration in silvopastoral systems. Agroforestry in the Americas. 10(39-40): 109-116.

Alvarado, J., Andrade, H. & Segura, M. (2013). Soil organic carbon storage in coffee production systems (Coffea arabica L.) in the municipality of Líbano, Tolima, Colombia. Colombia Forestry. 16(1): 21-31. doi: 10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2013.1.a02

Arbeláez, G., Barrera, X., Gómez, R. & Suárez, R. (2015). The ABC of Colombia's commitments for COP 21. 2 ed. WWWF. Colombia. Retrieved from: https://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/cambioclimatico/pdf/colombia_hacia_la_COP21/ ABC_de_los_Compromisos_de_Colombia_para_la_COP21_VF.pdf.

Burbano, B., Córdoba, J. & León, J. (2009). Quantification of total carbon of alder (Alnus jorullensis) and soil component in agroforestry arrangements, municipality of Pasto, Nariño. Recovered from: http://biblioteca.udenar.edu.co:8085/atenea/biblioteca/91382.pdf.

Carvajal, T., Lamela, L. & Cuesta, A. (2012). Evaluation of the tree species Sambucus nigra and Acacia decurrens as a supplement for dairy cows in the Sabana of Bogotá, Colombia. Rev. Pasture and Forage. 35 (4): 417:429.

Carvajal, A., Feijoo, A., Quintero, H. & Rondón, M. (2009). Soil organic carbon in different land uses of Colombian Andean landscapes. Rev. of soil science and plant nutrition. 9(3): 222-235. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27912009000300005.

Céspedes, F., Fernández, J., Gobbi, J. & Bernardis, C. (2012). Soil and root carbon reservoir in a grazing grassland and prairie. Rev. Fitotec. 35 (1): 79 - 86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719-38902018005000405

Delgado, I., Daza, C., Luna, C., Leonel, H. & Forero, P. (2016). Quantification of radical carbon Morella pubescens (Willd.) Wilbur in two Nariño agroecosystems. Colombia Forestry. 19 (2): 209-218. doi: https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2016.2.a06

Fernández, C., Cely, G. & Serrano, P. (2019). Quantification of carbon sequestration and analysis of soil properties in natural covers and a pine plantation in the Rabanal páramo, Colombia. Cuadernos de Geografía: Rev. Colombiana de Geografía. 28(1): 121-133. doi: 10.15446/rcdg.v28n1.66152

Forero, S., Santos, L., Andradre, H., & Madrigal, M. (2018). Carbon capture in biomass in forest plantations and agroforestry systems in Armero-Guayabal, Tolima, Colombia. RIAA, 9(2), 12.

Gayoso, J. & Guerra, J. (2005). Carbon content in the aerial biomass of native forests in Chile. Institute of Forest Management. Forest. 26 (2): 33-38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002005000200005.

Giraldo, A., Zapata, M. and Montoya, E. (2008). Carbon capture and flow in a Silvopastoral system in the Colombian Andean zone. Latin American Association of Animal Production Magazine. 16 (4): 215-220.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Climate Change Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/WG3AR5_SPM_brochure_es.pdf.

Gutiérrez, M. (2015). Carbon as an indicator of soil quality degradation under different cover in the Guerrero páramo. Recovered from: http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/50818/1/53120928.2015.pdf.

Holdrige, L. (2000). Ecology based on life zones. San José Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura. 216 p.

Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies, United Nations Development Programme, Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, National Planning Department. (IDEAM, UNDP, MADS, DNP). (2015). National Inventory of Greenhouse Gases (GHG) of Colombia. Third National Communication on Climate Change of Colombia. Retrieved from:

Ibrahim, M., Chacón, M., Cuartas, C., Naranjo J. Ponce, G., Vega, P., Casasola, F. and Rojas, J. (2007). Soil carbon storage and tree biomass in land-use systems in livestock landscapes in Colombia, Costa Rica and Nicaragua. Agroforestry of the Americas. 45: 27-36.

León, J., León, J., Y Zamora, H. (2012). Climate change mitigation strategies on High Andean cattle farms in the department of Nariño. Rev. Unimar. 59(0): 23-38.

Lok, S., Fraga, S. Noda, A., Y García, M. (2013). Soil carbon storage in three tropical livestock systems in operation with cattle. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science. 47(1): 75- 82.

Lorenz, K. & Lal, R. (2015). Soil organic carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. A review Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag - EDP, Sciences – INRA. Rev. Agron. Sustain. 2(13): 443-454. doi: 10.1007/s13593-014-0212-y.

MacDicken, K. (1997). A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects. Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, Arlington. Recuperada de: http://www.aecidcf.org.co/Ponencias/2016/septiembre/MI120916- 1/Ref.7.Guia_Carbono.pdf.

Martínez, E., Fuentes, J. & Acevedo, E. (2008). Organic carbon and soil properties. Soil science and plant nutrition review. 8(1): 68-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718- 27912008000100006.

Mera, A., & Zamora, K. (2007). Establishment and initial evaluation of scattered tree arrangements in association with kikuyo grass in the Pasto altiplano. Retrieved from: http://biblioteca.udenar.edu.co:8085/bibliotecavirtual/Searh.aspx.

Moreno, F. & Lara, W. (2003). Variation of soil organic carbon in intervened primary and secondary forests. Measuring carbon sequestration in tropical forest ecosystems in Colombia: Contributions to climate change mitigation. 1st ed. Medellín: National University of Colombia. 313 p.

Paz, F., Wong, J., & Torres, R. (2012). Current State of Knowledge of the Carbon Cycle and its Interactions in Mexico: Synthesis to 2015. National Synthesis Series. Texcoco, State of Mexico, Mexico: Mexican Carbon Program-Autonomous University of the State of Mexico-National Institute of Ecology.

Salinas, Z. & Hernández, P. (2007). Guide for the design of forest and bioenergy CDM projects. 83° ed. Turrialba, Costa Rica CATIE: Ree Sheck.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2015). Framework Convention on Climate Change. Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Proposal by the President Draft decision -/CP.21. United Nations. Paris, France. Retrieved from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/spa/l09s.pdf.

Verhulst, N., François, I., & Govaerts, B. (2015). Conservation Agriculture and Soil Carbon Sequestration: Between Myth and Reality of the Farmer. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Mexico City. Retrieved from: http://conservacion.cimmyt.org/es/component/docman/doc_view/1504-captura-de-carbono- 2015.

Walkley, A. & Black, C. (1934). An examination of the Degtajareff’s method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Rev. Soil Science. 37(1): 29-38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.

World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2019). WMO Greenhouse Gas Bulletin. The State of Greenhouse Gases in the Atmosphere Based on Global Observations through 2018. Recuperada de: https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=10100.
How to Cite
Solarte, J., Males, D., & Ortiz, A. (2020). Quantification of carbon capture in different soil uses. Revista De Ciencias Agrícolas, 37(1). Retrieved from https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rfacia/article/view/5642