Fertilization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L. group Phureja)

Authors

  • Tulio César Lagos-Burbano Universidad de Nariño
  • Maria Dyanela Betancourt Andrade Universidad de Nariño

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.213802.166

Keywords:

Behavior, creole, genotypes, locations, yield

Abstract

Potato fertilization is an important and pricey task, especially when soil analysis is not considered to define fertilization according to its nutritional requirements. The objective of this study was to evaluate genotypes of Solanum tuberosum group Phureja at different levels of fertilization (LF) in four localities in the department of Nariño. The LF were 0, 60, 70, and 80% of the dose used in the traditional fertilization of the area (900Kg ha-1 of 10-30-10). The split-plot design was used. The LF was located in the main plot, and the genotypes were in the subplots. The genotypes with the best performance in Botana were UdenarStCr10 with 60%, 70%, and 80% LF, UdenarStCr42 with 60% and 80% LF, and UdenarStCr42 with 80% LF with yields between 29.92 and 38.22t ha-1. In the locality of Gualmatán, the best genotype with a LF of 60% was UdenarStCr10, with 70% were UdenarStCr10, UdenarStC42 and UdenarStCr54, and with 80% were UdenarStCr1, UdenarStCr42 and UdenarStCr54 whose yields ranged between 43.58 and 52.91t ha-1. In San Juan, they were UdenarStCr10 with 60% and 80% LF, UdenarStCr42 and UdenarStCr54 with 70% LF with yields between 9.53 and 18.85t ha-1. UdenarStCr1, UdenarStCr10, UdenarStCr42, and UdenarStCr45 responded well to low fertilization levels in all locations. As a result, evaluating them in other environments is recommended to use them as commercial crops or as parents in plant breeding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aguilar, A.Y.; Vilchez, D.R.; Benavides, R.A.H.; Rodriguez, J.Q.; Quezada, U.R.Q.; Ramos, G.M.C. (2020). Uso de marcadores moleculares para determinar la variabilidad genética de papa (Solanum tuberosum). PURIQ. 2(2): 126-142. doi: https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.2.2.71

Anning, D.K.; Qiu, H.; Zhang, C.; Ghanney, P.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y. (2021). Maize straw return and nitrogen rate effects on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) performance and soil physicochemical characteristics in Northwest China. Sustainability. 13(10): 5508. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105508

Agronet. (2018). Red de Información y Comunicación del Sector Agropecuario Colombiano. Recovered from http://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica

Bernal, N. (2018). Modelado del Calibre y la competición intra-específica por rendimiento de tubérculos de papa criolla Solanum tuberosum grupo Phureja bajo diferentes densidades de siembra. Recovered from https://acortar.link/Vd0dKx

FAO-Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación. (2012). Statistical Yearbook 2012 World Food and Agriculture. Rome, Food Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Recovered from https://www.fao.org/3/i2490e/i2490e00.htm

FAOSTAT. (2016). Base de datos estadísticos de la FAO. Recovered from http://faostat.fao.org/site/336/ default.aspx

Ierna, A.; Pandino, G.; Lombardo, S.; Mauromicale, G. (2011). Tuber yield, water and fertilizer productivity in early potato as affected by a combination of irrigation and fertilization. Agricultural Water Management. 101(1): 35-41.

Keiluweit, M.; Bougoure, J.J.; Nico, P.S.; Pett-Ridge, J.; Weber, P.K.; Kleber, M. (2015). Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates. Nature Climate Change. 5(6): 588-595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2580

Kunkel, R.; Holstad, N. (1972). Potato chip color, specific gravity, and fertilization of potatoes with N–P–K. American Potato Journal. 49(2):43–62. doi: 10.1007/bf02862816

Levallois, P.; Theriault, M.; Rouffignat, J.; Tessier, S.; Landry, R.; Ayotte, P.; Chiasson, C. (1998). Groundwater contamination by nitrates associated with intensive potato culture in Quebec. Science of the Total Environment. 217(1-2): 91-101.

López, R.F.; Marín, M.C.; Ruiz, E.S.; Covarrubias, O.Á.R.; Delgado, H.L. (2020). Fertilización NPK, distribución de biomasa y número de minitubérculos de papa en invernadero. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 11(8): 1827-1838.

MADR - Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. (2020). Cadena de la papa. Recovered from https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Papa/Documentos/2020-06-30%20Cifras%20Sectoriales.pdf

Martínez, N.M.; Ligarreto, G. A. (2005). Evaluación de cinco genotipos promisorios de papa Solanum tuberosum sp. Andigena según desempeño agronómico y calidad industrial. Agronomía Colombiana. 23(1): 17-27.

Muñoz, L.A.; Lucero, A.M. (2008). Efecto de la fertilización orgánica en el cultivo de papa criolla Solanum phureja. Agronomía Colombiana. 26(2): 340-346.

Murillo, R.L.; Cunuhay, K.E.; Trávez, R.T.; Méndez, C.U.; Coronel, A.E.; Albornoz, A. B. (2016). Respuesta de variedades de papa (Solanum tuberorum, L) a la aplicación de abonos orgánicos y fertilización química. Revista Ciencia y Tecnología. 9(1): 11-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.18779/cyt.v9i1.205

Ortiz, O.; Mares, V. (2017). The Historical, Social, and Economic Importance of the Potato Crop. In: Kumar Chakrabarti S.; Xie C.; Kumar Tiwari J. (eds). The Potato Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. pp. 1-10. Cham: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66135-3_1

Ozturk, E.; Kavurmacı, Z.; Kara, K.; Polat, T. (2010). The effects of different nitrogen and phosphorus rates on some quality traits of potato. Potato Research. 53(4): 309-312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-010-9176-8

Porras, P. (2015). Modelo Productivo de la Papa Variedad Diacol Capiro. Colombia: Corpoica. doi: https://doi.org/10.21930/978-958-740-210-0

Prunell, Y.M. (2019). Caracterización morfológica de individuos jóvenes de especies e híbridos de Eucalyptus spp.: sus implicancias en el manejo forestal. Recovered from http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/89209

Román, M.; Hurtado, G. (2002). Guía técnica: cultivo de la papa. Centro Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria y Forestal (Centa), El Salvador. Recovered from http://istphuancane.pe.tripod.com/docs/agrop/papa.pdf

Saravia, D.; Farfan-Vignolo, E.R.; Gutierrez, R.; Mendiburu, F. de.; Schafleitner, R.; Bonierbale, M.W.; Khan, M.A. (2016). Yield and physiological response of potatoes indicate different strategies to cope with drought stress and nitrogen fertilization. American Journal of Potato Research. 93: 288–295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-016-9505-9

Sifuentes, E.; Ruelas, J.d.R.; Macias, J.; Talamantes, I.; Palacios, C.A.; Valenzuela, B.E. (2015). Fenología y tiempo en el manejo del riego y fertilización del cultivo de papa. Biotecnia. 17(3): 42-48.

Talburt, W.; Smith, O. (1967). Potato processing. 4th Ed. California: AVI Publishing Company. 588p.

Tekalign, T.; Nigussie, D. (2012). Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on vertisols at Debre Berhan, in the central highlands of Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science. 3(2): 016-024.

Torres, B.J.; Suarez, M.A. (2014). Nutrient uptake of the criolla potato (Solanum phureja var. Galeras) for the determination of critical nutritional levels. Agronomía Colombiana. 32(1): 59 69. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n1.41811

Vega, D.A. (2015). Evaluation of papa criolla "Solanum phureja" clone paisa" production in high-density polyethylene containers within the framework of urban agriculture. Luna Azul. (40): 35-46. doi: 10.17151/luaz.2015.40.4

Zaheer, K.; Akhtar, M.H. (2016). Potato production, usage, and nutrition—a review. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 56(5): 711-721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.724479

Zelalem, A.; Tekalign, T.; Nigussie, D. (2009). Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on vertisols at Debre Berhan, in the central highlands of Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science. 3(2):016–024.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-21

How to Cite

Lagos-Burbano, T. C., & Betancourt Andrade, M. D. (2021). Fertilization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L. group Phureja). Revista De Ciencias Agrícolas, 38(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.213802.166