contadores
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Research Article

Vol. 38 No. 2 (2021): Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas - Second semester, July - December 2021

Fertilization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L. group Phureja)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.213802.166
Submitted
August 9, 2021
Published
2021-09-21

Abstract

Potato fertilization is an important and pricey task, especially when soil analysis is not considered to define fertilization according to its nutritional requirements. The objective of this study was to evaluate genotypes of Solanum tuberosum group Phureja at different levels of fertilization (LF) in four localities in the department of Nariño. The LF were 0, 60, 70, and 80% of the dose used in the traditional fertilization of the area (900Kg ha-1 of 10-30-10). The split-plot design was used. The LF was located in the main plot, and the genotypes were in the subplots. The genotypes with the best performance in Botana were UdenarStCr10 with 60%, 70%, and 80% LF, UdenarStCr42 with 60% and 80% LF, and UdenarStCr42 with 80% LF with yields between 29.92 and 38.22t ha-1. In the locality of Gualmatán, the best genotype with a LF of 60% was UdenarStCr10, with 70% were UdenarStCr10, UdenarStC42 and UdenarStCr54, and with 80% were UdenarStCr1, UdenarStCr42 and UdenarStCr54 whose yields ranged between 43.58 and 52.91t ha-1. In San Juan, they were UdenarStCr10 with 60% and 80% LF, UdenarStCr42 and UdenarStCr54 with 70% LF with yields between 9.53 and 18.85t ha-1. UdenarStCr1, UdenarStCr10, UdenarStCr42, and UdenarStCr45 responded well to low fertilization levels in all locations. As a result, evaluating them in other environments is recommended to use them as commercial crops or as parents in plant breeding.

References

  1. Aguilar, A.Y.; Vilchez, D.R.; Benavides, R.A.H.; Rodriguez, J.Q.; Quezada, U.R.Q.; Ramos, G.M.C. (2020). Uso de marcadores moleculares para determinar la variabilidad genética de papa (Solanum tuberosum). PURIQ. 2(2): 126-142. doi: https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.2.2.71
  2. Anning, D.K.; Qiu, H.; Zhang, C.; Ghanney, P.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y. (2021). Maize straw return and nitrogen rate effects on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) performance and soil physicochemical characteristics in Northwest China. Sustainability. 13(10): 5508. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105508
  3. Agronet. (2018). Red de Información y Comunicación del Sector Agropecuario Colombiano. Recovered from http://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica
  4. Bernal, N. (2018). Modelado del Calibre y la competición intra-específica por rendimiento de tubérculos de papa criolla Solanum tuberosum grupo Phureja bajo diferentes densidades de siembra. Recovered from https://acortar.link/Vd0dKx
  5. FAO-Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación. (2012). Statistical Yearbook 2012 World Food and Agriculture. Rome, Food Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Recovered from https://www.fao.org/3/i2490e/i2490e00.htm
  6. FAOSTAT. (2016). Base de datos estadísticos de la FAO. Recovered from http://faostat.fao.org/site/336/ default.aspx
  7. Ierna, A.; Pandino, G.; Lombardo, S.; Mauromicale, G. (2011). Tuber yield, water and fertilizer productivity in early potato as affected by a combination of irrigation and fertilization. Agricultural Water Management. 101(1): 35-41.
  8. Keiluweit, M.; Bougoure, J.J.; Nico, P.S.; Pett-Ridge, J.; Weber, P.K.; Kleber, M. (2015). Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates. Nature Climate Change. 5(6): 588-595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2580
  9. Kunkel, R.; Holstad, N. (1972). Potato chip color, specific gravity, and fertilization of potatoes with N–P–K. American Potato Journal. 49(2):43–62. doi: 10.1007/bf02862816
  10. Levallois, P.; Theriault, M.; Rouffignat, J.; Tessier, S.; Landry, R.; Ayotte, P.; Chiasson, C. (1998). Groundwater contamination by nitrates associated with intensive potato culture in Quebec. Science of the Total Environment. 217(1-2): 91-101.
  11. López, R.F.; Marín, M.C.; Ruiz, E.S.; Covarrubias, O.Á.R.; Delgado, H.L. (2020). Fertilización NPK, distribución de biomasa y número de minitubérculos de papa en invernadero. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 11(8): 1827-1838.
  12. MADR - Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. (2020). Cadena de la papa. Recovered from https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Papa/Documentos/2020-06-30%20Cifras%20Sectoriales.pdf
  13. Martínez, N.M.; Ligarreto, G. A. (2005). Evaluación de cinco genotipos promisorios de papa Solanum tuberosum sp. Andigena según desempeño agronómico y calidad industrial. Agronomía Colombiana. 23(1): 17-27.
  14. Muñoz, L.A.; Lucero, A.M. (2008). Efecto de la fertilización orgánica en el cultivo de papa criolla Solanum phureja. Agronomía Colombiana. 26(2): 340-346.
  15. Murillo, R.L.; Cunuhay, K.E.; Trávez, R.T.; Méndez, C.U.; Coronel, A.E.; Albornoz, A. B. (2016). Respuesta de variedades de papa (Solanum tuberorum, L) a la aplicación de abonos orgánicos y fertilización química. Revista Ciencia y Tecnología. 9(1): 11-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.18779/cyt.v9i1.205
  16. Ortiz, O.; Mares, V. (2017). The Historical, Social, and Economic Importance of the Potato Crop. In: Kumar Chakrabarti S.; Xie C.; Kumar Tiwari J. (eds). The Potato Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. pp. 1-10. Cham: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66135-3_1
  17. Ozturk, E.; Kavurmacı, Z.; Kara, K.; Polat, T. (2010). The effects of different nitrogen and phosphorus rates on some quality traits of potato. Potato Research. 53(4): 309-312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-010-9176-8
  18. Porras, P. (2015). Modelo Productivo de la Papa Variedad Diacol Capiro. Colombia: Corpoica. doi: https://doi.org/10.21930/978-958-740-210-0
  19. Prunell, Y.M. (2019). Caracterización morfológica de individuos jóvenes de especies e híbridos de Eucalyptus spp.: sus implicancias en el manejo forestal. Recovered from http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/89209
  20. Román, M.; Hurtado, G. (2002). Guía técnica: cultivo de la papa. Centro Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria y Forestal (Centa), El Salvador. Recovered from http://istphuancane.pe.tripod.com/docs/agrop/papa.pdf
  21. Saravia, D.; Farfan-Vignolo, E.R.; Gutierrez, R.; Mendiburu, F. de.; Schafleitner, R.; Bonierbale, M.W.; Khan, M.A. (2016). Yield and physiological response of potatoes indicate different strategies to cope with drought stress and nitrogen fertilization. American Journal of Potato Research. 93: 288–295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-016-9505-9
  22. Sifuentes, E.; Ruelas, J.d.R.; Macias, J.; Talamantes, I.; Palacios, C.A.; Valenzuela, B.E. (2015). Fenología y tiempo en el manejo del riego y fertilización del cultivo de papa. Biotecnia. 17(3): 42-48.
  23. Talburt, W.; Smith, O. (1967). Potato processing. 4th Ed. California: AVI Publishing Company. 588p.
  24. Tekalign, T.; Nigussie, D. (2012). Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on vertisols at Debre Berhan, in the central highlands of Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science. 3(2): 016-024.
  25. Torres, B.J.; Suarez, M.A. (2014). Nutrient uptake of the criolla potato (Solanum phureja var. Galeras) for the determination of critical nutritional levels. Agronomía Colombiana. 32(1): 59 69. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n1.41811
  26. Vega, D.A. (2015). Evaluation of papa criolla "Solanum phureja" clone paisa" production in high-density polyethylene containers within the framework of urban agriculture. Luna Azul. (40): 35-46. doi: 10.17151/luaz.2015.40.4
  27. Zaheer, K.; Akhtar, M.H. (2016). Potato production, usage, and nutrition—a review. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 56(5): 711-721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.724479
  28. Zelalem, A.; Tekalign, T.; Nigussie, D. (2009). Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on vertisols at Debre Berhan, in the central highlands of Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science. 3(2):016–024.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.