contadores
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Research Article

Vol. 42 No. 1 (2025): Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas - Primer cuatrimestre, Enero - Abril 2025

Fertilization levels with NPK in bush pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes under Andisol soil: Fertilization NPK in genotypes of bush pea

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.20254201.249
Submitted
April 2, 2023
Published
2025-04-25

Abstract

Pea (Pisum sativum L.) farmers in Colombia, especially in Nariño, lack knowledge about the appropriate fertilizer dosage needed to achieve optimal crop yields, resulting in reduced product competitiveness in the market. The objective was to evaluate the effect of six levels of NPK fertilization on yield components of four promising lines of bush pea with the afila gene in four municipalities in the Nariño department. A split-plot design with three replications was used in the experiment. The principal plot corresponded to the four promising lines of bush pea with the afila gene, and the subplot corresponded to six levels of fertilization. The results showed differential responses of the genotypes to different levels of fertilization. Based on the number of pods per plant, within the ARB15 line in Yacuanquer and ARB16 in Pasto, the result of the 120-16-56 fertilization level was higher than the recommended level based on soil analysis. In number of grains per pod, fertilization based on soil analysis showed similar results to the other five fertilization levels that were evaluated within the four pea lines in the different locations, except in Pasto within the ARB12 line, where 7.45 grains per pod were obtained, being lower than that obtained by the 120-6-56 level, which was 9.02. In terms of yield, the lines ARB2, ARB12, and ARB16 did not present a superior response to the fertilization level applied based on soil analysis. The best yield for ARB15 was obtained with a fertilization level of 90-12-42 in two locations.

References

  1. Abou Seeda, M. A.; Abou El-Nour, E. A. A.; Yaseen A. A.; Gad Mervat, M.; Sahar M. Z. (2020). Importance of sulfur and its roles in plants physiology: A review. Current Science International. 9(2): 198-231. https://doi.org/10.36632/csi/2020.9.2.18
  2. Alarcón, P. (1997). Evaluación de variedades de arveja Santa Isabel e ICA Tominé con diferentes niveles de fertilización química y biofertilizantes en el municipio de Pasca Cundinamarca.
  3. http://sired.udenar.edu.co/id/eprint/5951
  4. Carvalho, J. de A.; Santana, M. J. de; Pereira, G. M.; Pereira, J. R. D.; Queiroz, T. M. (2004). Níveis de déficit hídrico em diferents estágios fenológicos da cultura de berinjela (Solanum melongena L.). Engenharia Agrícola. 24(2): 320-327. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162004000200010
  5. Checa-Coral, O; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, M. (2015). Resistencia a oídio Erysiphe polygoni y rendimiento en arveja afila Pisum sativum L. Revista Temas Agrarios. 20(2): 58-71. https://doi.org/10.21897/rta.v20i2.759
  6. Checa, O. E; Rodríguez, D. M; Ruiz, M. H; Muriel, J. E. (2021). La arveja. Investigación y tecnología en el sur de Colombia. 1ª edición. Colombia: Universidad de Nariño. 217p.
  7. Endres, L.; Souza, J. L. de; Teodoro, I.; Marroquim, P. M. G.; dos Santos, C. M.; de Brito, J. E. D. (2010). Gas exchange alteration caused by water deficit during the bean reproductive stage. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 14(1): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662010000100002
  8. Gadissa, T.; Chemeda, D. (2009). Effects of drip irrigation levels and planting methods in yield and yields components of green pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Bako, Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management. 96(11): 1673-1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.07.004
  9. Gianoli, E. (2001). Lack of differential plasticity to shading of internodes and petioles with growth habit in Convolvulus arvensis (Convolvulaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences. 162(6): 1247-1252. https://doi.org/10.1086/322950
  10. Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi-IGAC. (2004). Estudio general de suelos y clasificación de tierras del Departamento de Nariño. 1ª edición. Colombia: Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi.
  11. Intagri, S.C. (2022) La Importancia del Encalado en el Manejo de los Suelos Ácidos ParteII. https://www.intagri.com/articulos/suelos/la-importancia-del-encalado-en-el-manejo-de-los-suelos-acidos-parte-II
  12. Khatkar, R.; Abraham, T.; Joseph, S. A. (2007). Effect of bio-fertilizers and sulphur fertilization on growth and yield of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.). Legume Research. 30(3): 233-234.
  13. Ligarreto, G. A.; Ospina, A. H.; Andrés R. (2009). Análisis de parámetros heredables asociados al rendimiento y precocidad en arveja voluble (Pisum sativum L.) tipo Santa Isabel. Agronomía Colombiana. 27(3): 333-339.
  14. Múnera, G.; Meza, D. (2012). El fósforo elemento indispensable para la vida vegetal. https://repositorio.utp.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11059/5248/el%20fosforo%20elemento.pdf?sequence=1
  15. Patel, M. P.; Richhariya, G. P.; Sharma, R. D.; Namdeo, K. N. (2012). Effect of fertility levels on nutrient contents and uptake of soybean (Glycine max) genotypes. Crop Research. 44(1-2): 71-74.
  16. Ruano, C. (2001). Evaluación de la fertilización con nitrógeno, fósforo y potasio sobre genotipos de arveja (Pisum sativum L.) en un suelo Vitrandic Dystrustepsts en Nariño. http://sired.udenar.edu.co/cgi/oai2
  17. Saket, S.; Singh, S. B.; Namdeo, K. N.; Parihar, S. S. (2014). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on yield, quality and nutrients uptake of lentil. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 16(3): 238-241. 10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss4pp786-794
  18. Santana, M. J. de; Carvalho, J. de A.; Andrade, M. J. B. de; Braga, J. C.; Gervásio, G. G. (2008). Coeficiente de cultura e análise do rendimento do feijoeiro sob regime de irrigação. Irriga. 13(1): 92-112. https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2008v13n1p92-112
  19. Sharma, R. D.; da Fonseca, C. E. L. (2000). Efeito de meloidogyne javanica no crescimento da ervilha. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 35(1): 115-120. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000100014
  20. Singh, D. (2017) Effect of sources of phosphorus on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in pea (Pisum sativum L). Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 19(2): 240-242.
  21. Valverde, O; Valverde, F; Calvache. (2006). Efecto residual y acumulativo del fósforo sobre el rendimiento de papa (Solanum tuberosum. L) en cuatro Andisoles del Ecuador. https://www.engormix.com/agricultura/articulos/efecto-residual-acumulativo-fosforo-t44680.htm
  22. Zhang, Q; Tang, D.; Yang, X.; Geng, S.; He, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yi, X.; Ni, K.; Liu, M.; Ruan, J. (2021). Plant availability of magnesium in typical tea plantation soils. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12: 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.641501

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.