contadores
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Article

Vol. 41 No. 1 (2024): Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas - January - april 2024

Soil physical properties as indicators of histosol degradation in Colombia

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.20244101.226
Submitted
September 15, 2023
Published
2024-03-18

Abstract

Changes in soil utilization exert detrimental effects on its properties, emphasizing the critical need for a thorough evaluation to mitigate their repercussions on the ecosystem. This investigation was conducted aiming to assess the physical degradation in histosol soils in the Putumayo department, Colombia, caused by alterations in land use. For this, we assessed two types of areas: those without intervention (T0) and those affected by deformation in mound structures caused by the combined actions of livestock and high moisture, commonly known as “tatucos”.  The assessment categorized these areas based on the percentage deformation incidence: low degradation (T1), moderate degradation (T2), and high degradation (T3). Sampling was conducted at a depth of 15 cm, both in the tatuco-affected zone and its surrounding area. Measurements were taken for mound height and diameter, as well as physical properties such as bulk and real density, porosity, volumetric moisture, penetration resistance, and the degree of organic material decomposition. The primary land use identified in the study area was extensive livestock farming. It was established that in areas with high levels of degradation (T3), there was an average mound diameter of 151.9 ± 4.46 cm and a height of 22.7 ± 2.59 cm. Regarding physical properties in the area adjacent to the mound, there was a bulk density of 0.24 g.cm-3, a real density of 1.62 g.cm-3, and a penetration resistance of 0.71 MPa. These values were significantly higher than those observed in areas without intervention. Hence, it can be inferred that the alteration in land use is causing a substantial change in the physical properties of these soils, which are vital for the agroecosystems in the southern regions of Colombia.

References

  1. Ángeles F, C., Hernández A, J. D., Moisés O, A., & Morales M, A. K. (2010, March 18). Determinación de la densidad real, porosidad del suelo y humedad gravimétrica, Reporte, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. slideshare. https://es.slideshare.net/kryzdfragg/densidad-real-y-aparente
  2. Alves-Bispo, D. F.; Christofaro Silva, A.; Christofaro, C.; Naves Silva, M.L.; Soares Barbosa, M.; Pereira Christofaro Silva, B.; Moraes Barral, U. (2015). Caracterização de turfeiras das cabeceiras do Rio Araçuaí, Minas Gerais. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Do Solo. 39(2): 475-489. https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs20140337
  3. Arabia, T., Basri, H., Manfarizah, Zainabun, & Mukhtaruddin. (2020). Physical and chemical characteristics in peat lands of Aceh Jaya District, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 499(1), 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/499/1/012004
  4. Bastidas, J.; López, G. (1972). Caracteres cuantitativos y reconocimientos de malezas en praderas artificiales de clima frio del altiplano de Pasto. Rev. Ciencias Agrícolas, 4(2): 83–97. https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rfacia/article/view/1703
  5. Caldwell, P.V. Vepraskas, M. J., & Gregory, J. D. (2007). Physical Properties of Natural Organic Soils in Carolina Bays of the Southeastern United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71(3), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0108
  6. Da Rocha, H.O. (1973). Mapificación, caracterización y clasificación de los suelos organicos del Valle de Sibundoy. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad nacional de Colombia – Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario: Bogotá]. Reposorio Agrosavia. https://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12324/15765/25624_10731.pdf?sequence=1
  7. Di Gerónimo, P.F.; Videla, C.; Fernandez, M.E.; Zamuner, E.C.; Laclau, P. (2018). Changes in soil chemical and biochemical properties associated with replacement of natural grasslands by pinus Radiata D. Don and agricultural rotations. Chilean Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences. 34(2): 89–101.http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719-38902018005000302
  8. Dos Santos, O. A. Q., da Silva Neto, E. C., García, A. C., Fagundes, H. de S., Diniz, Y. V. de F. G., Ferreira, R., & Pereira, M. G. (2020). Impact of land use on Histosols properties in urban agriculture ecosystems of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil . Revista Brasileira de Ciência Do Solo, 44, e0200041. https://doi.org/10.36783/18069657RBCS20200041
  9. Bolivar, G.A.; Ordóñez Delgado, N. (2016). Clasificación taxonómica de los suelos orgánicos en el distrito de drenaje de Sibundoy. Suelos Ecuatoriales. 47(1-2): 78-92. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7831511.pdf
  10. Hartemink, A. E., Zhang, Y., Bockheim, J. G., Curi, N., Silva, S. H. G., Grauer-Gray, J., Lowe, D. J., & Krasilnikov, P. (2020). Soil horizon variation: A review. Advances in Agronomy, 160(1), 125–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/BS.AGRON.2019.10.003
  11. Huat, B.B. (2006). Deformation and Shear Strength Characteristics of Some Tropical Peat and Organic Soils. Pertanika J. Sci & Technol. 14(1-2): 61-74. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JST%20Vol.%2014%20(1&2)%20Jan.%202006%20(View%20Full%20Journal).pdf
  12. Ibañez, S.; Gisbert, J.; Moreno, H. (2011). Histosoles. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/12886/Histosoles.pdf
  13. IGAC -Instituto Geografico Agustin Codazzi. (1995). Suelos de Colombia: origen, evolución, clasificación, distribución y uso En. Instituto Geográfico "Agustín Codazzi." Subdirección de agrologia. 632 pp
  14. IGAC- Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. (2016). Levantamiento de suelos, capacidad de uso de las tierras y cobertura terrestre excala 1:25.000 En: NCODER e Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. Área plana del distrito de adecuacion de tierras de Sibundoy Departamento del Putumayo, Levantamiento de suelos, capacidad de uso de las tierras y cobertura terrestre escala 1:25.000. (pp. 177 - 180). Departamento del Putumayo. 796 pp.
  15. Mora-Marín, M.A.; Ríos Pescador, L.; Ríos Ramos, L.; Almario Charry, J.L. (2017). Impacto de la actividad ganadera sobre el suelo en Colombia. Ingeniería y Región. 17: 1. https://doi.org/10.25054/22161325.1212
  16. Moreno-Cáliz, E.; Gutírrez-Castorena, M.; Guerrero-Peña, A.; Ortiz-Solorio, C.A.; Palma-López, D.J. (2004). Micromorfología en la clasificaciín de Histosoles en humedales de Tabasco, México. Terra Latinoamericana. 22(2): 153–160. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57322203
  17. R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Austria. https://www.r-project.org/.
  18. Renard, D.; Birk, J.J.; Glaser, B.; Iriarte, J.; Grisard, G., Karl, J.; McKey, D. (2012). Origin of mound-field landscapes: A multi-proxy approach combining contemporary vegetation, carbon stable isotopes and phytoliths. Plant and Soil. 351(1-2): 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0967-8
  19. Ruiz, H.; Amézquita, E.; Legarda, L.; Peña, J. (2000). Efecto de cuatro sistemas de labranza sobre las condiciones físicas de un suelo vertisol degradado. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas. 17(1): 282-293. https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rfacia/article/view/1061/1299
  20. Soil Survey Staff. (2022). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 13th edition. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
  21. Taboada, M.A. (2007). Efectos del pisoteo y pastoreo animal sobre suelos de siembra directa 4° simposio de ganadería en siembra directa. San Luis: Asociación Argentina de Productores en Siembra Directa. https://www.produccion-animal.com.ar/suelos_ganaderos/49-efectos_pisoteo.pdf
  22. Thériault, L., Dessureault-Rompré, J., & Caron, J. (2019). Short-Term Improvement in Soil Physical Properties of Cultivated Histosols through Deep-Rooted Crop Rotation and Subsoiling. Agronomy Journal, 111(4), 2084–2096. https://doi.org/10.2134/AGRONJ2018.04.0281
  23. United States Department of Agriculture. (2022). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. USDA-United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation Service. (pp. 200). Thirteenth Edition, 2022. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Keys-to-Soil-Taxonomy.pdf
  24. Valenzuela, I.G. y Torrente, A (2013). Física de suelos. En: Sociedad Colombiana de la Ciencia del Suelo /Burbano,H. y Silva, F. (eds.). Ciencia del suelo, Principios básicos. (pp. 65 - 95). Segunda Edición. Bogotá,D.C., Colombia. Offser Gráfico Editores. 580 pp.
  25. Warmling MT, Albuquerque JA, Almeida JA, Warmling MI. (2017). Characteristics of soils in highland wetlands as a subsidy to identifying and setting their limits. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2017;41:e0150407. https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20150407

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.