contadores
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Article

Vol. 43 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 43 issue. 1 (2026): Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas - January - April 2026

Impact of regenerative agricultural practices on forage maize (Zea mays L.) yield under semiarid conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.2026431.286
Submitted
May 14, 2025
Published
2026-04-10

Abstract

Forage production is crucial for livestock in dry tropical regions due to its adaptability and nutrient supply, especially during the dry season when pastures deteriorate. A field experiment was conducted under dry Caribbean conditions in Cesar, Colombia, during 2023 to evaluate the regenerative production system of forage maize (Zea mays L.) ‘AGROSAVIA V-117’, planted at a density of 100,000 plants/ha. The experiment was laid out with five treatments: Control Fertilization (FNC), FNC + Amendment, FNC + Biofertilizers, FNC + Amendment + Biofertilizers, FNC + Amendment + Biofertilizers + Cover, FNC + 20%. Results showed green forage production ranging from 79.92 to 92.89 t/ha for FNC+biofertilizer and FNC+20%, respectively. The traditional fertilization + amendment + biofertilizer + cover crop achieved the highest values of ear production (20.64 t/ha). As for forage dry mass accumulation, the 20% improved conventional fertilization had the highest value with 25.48 t/ha, followed by conventional fertilization + biofertilizer with 24.86 t/ha. Although no significant statistical differences were observed between treatments, the results exceeded the national averages, highlighting the potential for incorporating regenerative, economically viable, and environmentally sustainable practices into livestock production systems in semiarid conditions.

References

  1. Aguirre Forero, S. E., Piraneque Gambasica, N. V., & Fernández, T. (2022). Suelo y cambio climático: Incluye estudio de casos (1st ed.). Editorial Unimagdalena. http://doi.org/10.21676/9789587464993
  2. Buchelt, A. C., de Mello Prado, R., Caione, G., de Almeida Carneiro, M., & Litter, F. A. (2021). Effects of silicon fertigation on dry matter production and crude protein contents of a pasture. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 21, 3402-3413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00615-9
  3. Bueno, G. A., Pardo, O., & Mojica, J. E. (2003). Ensilaje de cultivos forrajeros para la alimentación de bovinos en el Piedemonte Llanero. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria – Agrosavia. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/16992
  4. Cañet-Prades, F., Guie-Wong, J. S., Rodríguez, J. D., Muller-Castro, E., Chassot, O., & Arango-Berrocal, A. (2022). Aplicación de los principios de la agricultura regenerativa para aumentar los niveles de nutrientes en el suelo y enfrentar una emergencia de seguridad alimentaria y nutricional local en Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Regeneratio, 1(2), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.55924/ucireg.v1i2.12
  5. Castellanos-Navarrete, A., Chocobar-Guerra, A., Cox, R., Fonteyne, S., Govaert, B., Jespers, N., Kienle, F., Sayre, K. D., Enyanche, F., Martínez, B., & Verhulst, N. (2017). Protocolos para mediciones de plantas en las plataformas de investigación. Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo. https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7510959
  6. Coral Eraso, D. M., Lemos, G., & Jaramillo Velasteguí, R. E. (2021). Opciones de fertilización orgánico mineral y biocontrol en maíz, fríjol y soya (accessed 13 March 2025). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9aocJ7dvNw
  7. Cuenca, N. J., Chavarro, F., & Díaz, O. H. (2008). El sector de ganadería bovina en Colombia. Aplicación de modelos de series de tiempo al inventario ganadero. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, 16(1), 165-177.
  8. Cusworth, G., Lorimer, J., Brice, J., Garnett, T. (2022). Green rebranding: Regenerative agriculture, future‐pasts, and the naturalisation of livestock. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47(4), 1009-1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12555
  9. Dibala, R. H. (2019). Forage production and diversification for climate-smart tropical and temperate silvopastures. University of Missouri-Columbia. https://hdl.handle.net/10355/75004
  10. Faji, M., Kebede, G., Tsegahun, A., Mohammed, K., Minta, M., Feyissa, F., Mengistu, S. (2021). Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for forage biomass yield and nutritional quality. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(1), 65-81.
  11. Fan, H., Miao, R., Guo, C., Bao, X., He, W., Sun, Y., & Zhao, C. (2025). Research on the effect of diversified cropping on crop quality: A review. Agriculture, 15(5), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15050456
  12. Gantner, R., Steiner, Z., & Herman, G. (2021). Forages production. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:151:906608
  13. García Botina, M. J. (2021). Cadenas sostenibles ante un clima cambiante. El maíz en Colombia. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114766
  14. Gómez-Ramírez, L. F., Sierra-Baquero, P. V., Fuentes-Cassiani, D., & Rubiano-Rodríguez, J. A. (2023). Quimigación y bio-irrigación con pivote central para el control de Spodoptera frugiperda (J E Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) en maíz en el Caribe seco colombiano. Revista Chilena de Entomología, 49(1), 197-212.
  15. González-Álvarez, Á., Viloria-Marimón, O. M., Coronado-Hernández, Ó. E., Vélez-Pereira, A. M., Tesfagiorgis, K., Coronado-Hernández, J. R. (2019). Isohyetal maps of daily maximum rainfall for different return periods for the Colombian Caribbean Region. Water, 11(2), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020358
  16. Govaerts, B.; Vega, D., Chávez, X., Narro, L., San Vicente, F., Palacios, N., Pérez, M., González, G., Ortega, P., Carvajal, A., Arcos, A. L., Bolaños, J., Romero, N., Bolaños, J., Vanegas, Y. F., Echeverría, R., Jarvis, A., Jiménez, D., Ramírez-Villegas, J., Kropff, W., Gonzáñez, C., Navarro-Racines, C., Ordoñez, L., Prager, S., & Tapasco, J. (2019). Maíz para Colombia Visión 2030. CIMMYT. https://hdl.handle.net/10883/20218
  17. Gutiérrez-León, F. A., Alvarado-Ochoa, S. P., Reascos-Castillo, J. F., Ortiz-Flores, E. N., Portilla-Narvaez, A. R., & Rivera-Montesdeoca, M. A. (2023). Efecto sinérgico de la aplicación de biofertilizante y fertilizante nitrogenado en pasturas. Pastos y Forrajes, 46, e14.
  18. Jayasinghe, S. L., Thomas, D. T., Anderson, J. P., Chen, C., & Macdonald, B. C. T. (2023). Aplicación global de la agricultura regenerativa: una revisión de definiciones y enfoques de evaluación. Sustainability, 15(22), 15941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215941
  19. Khangura, R., Ferris, D., Wagg, C., & Bowyer, J. (2023). Regenerative agriculture—A literature review on the practices and mechanisms used to improve soil health. Sustainability, 15(3), 2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032338
  20. Khatun, M., Shuvo, M. A. R., Salam, M. T. B., & Rahman, S. M. H. (2019). Effect of organic amendments on soil salinity and the growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Science Today, 6(2), 106-111.
  21. Kumar, S., Sieverding, H., Lai, L., Thandiwe, N., Wienhold, B., Redfearn, D., Archer, D., Ussiri, D., Faust, D., Landblom, D., Grings, E., Stone, J., Jacquet, J., Pokharel, K., Liebig, M., Schemer, M., Sexton, P., Mitchel, R., Smalley, S., Osborne, S., Ali, S., Şentürklü, S., Sehgal, S., Owens, V., & Jin, V. (2019). Facilitating crop–livestock reintegration in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal, 111(5), 2141–2156. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.07.0441
  22. Liu, Y., Liang, F., Yan, S., Tu, T., Shi, Z., Pezzuolo, A., & Feng, Q. (2025). Optimizing fertilization strategies for low-carbon agriculture: Balancing greenhouse gas mitigation, soil health, and productivity. Results in Engineering, 27, 107094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107094
  23. Lone, A. A., Allai, B. A., & Nehvi, F. A. (2013). Growth, yield and economics of baby maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) practices. African journal of agricultural research, 8(36), 4537-4540. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR08.335
  24. Mahapatra, S., Kumar, D., Singh, B., & Sachan, P. K. (2021). Biofuels and their sources of production: A review on cleaner sustainable alternative against conventional fuel, in the framework of the food and energy nexus. Energy Nexus, 4, 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2021.100036
  25. Mkomwa, S., & Kassam, A. (2022). Conservation agriculture in Africa: climate-smart agricultural development. CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789245745.0000
  26. Naranjo, J. F., & Ruiz-Buitrago, J. D. (2020). Sobre algunos mitos y realidades de la ganadería. bovina. Revista Ciencia and Tecnología Agropecuaria, 21(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol21_num3_art:1524
  27. Newton, P., Civita, N., Frankel-Goldwater, L., Bartel, K., & Johns, C. (2020). What is regenerative agriculture? A review of scholar and practitioner definitions based on processes and outcomes. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 577723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.577723
  28. OCDE/FAO (2020). Perspectivas Agrícolas 2020-2029. OECDC publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a0848ac0-es
  29. Ogunleye, A. M. (2022). Semiarid Land Sustainable Agricultural Practices: The Evaluation of Annual Cover Cropping Systems Influence on Forage Productivity and Short-Term Soil Health Impact. University of Nevada. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2773849735/
  30. Paul, B. K., Mutegi, J. K., Wironen, M. B., Wood, S. A., Peters, M., Nyawira, S. S., Misiko, M. T., Dutta, S. K., Zingore, S., Oberthür, T., Notenbaert, A. M. O., & Cook, S. (2023). Livestock solutions to regenerate soils and landscapes for sustainable agri-food systems transformation in Africa. Outlook on agriculture, 52(2), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270231179747
  31. Peng, W., Wang, Z. K., Sun, X. C., Mu, X. H., Huan, C., Chen, F. J., Lixing, Y., & Mi, G. H. (2019). Interaction effect of nitrogen form and planting density on plant growth and nutrient uptake in maize seedlings. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 18(5): 1120-1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(18)61977-X
  32. Pretty, J. (2018). Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems. Science, 362(6417), eaav0294. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0294
  33. Pulleman, M. M., Rahn, E., & Valle Pilia, J. F. (2024). Agricultura regenerativa para sistemas cafeteros resilientes y con bajas emisiones de carbono-Una guía práctica. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141572
  34. R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.0.0. https://www.r-project.org/
  35. Rao, I. M., Peters, M., Castro, A., Schultze-Kraft, R., White, D., Fisher, M., Miles, J., Lascano Aguilar, C., Blümmel, M., Bungenstab, D., Tapasco, J., Hyman, G., Bolliger, A., Paul, B., van der Hoek, R., Maass, B., Tiemann, T., Cuchillo, M., Douxchamps, S., Villanueva, C., Rincón, Á., Ayarza, M., Rosenstock, T., Subbarao, G., Arango, J., Cardoso, J. A., Worthington, M., Chirinda, N., Notenbaert, A., Jenet, A., Schmidt, A., Vivas, N., Lefroy, R., Fahrney, K., Guimarães, E., Tohme, J., Cook, S., Herrero, M., Chacón, M., Searchinger, T., & Rudel, T. K. (2015). LivestockPlus- The sustainable intensification of forage-based agricultural systems to improve livelihoods and ecosystem services in the tropics. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/68840
  36. Rehberger, E., West, P. C., Spillane, C., & McKeown, P. C. (2023). What climate and environmental benefits of regenerative agriculture practices? an evidence review. Environmental Research Communications, 5, 052001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acd6dc
  37. Rowntree, J. E., Stanley, P. L., Maciel, I. C., Thorbecke, M., Rosenzweig, S. T., Hancock, D. W., Guzman, A., & Raven, M. R. (2020). Ecosystem impacts and productive capacity of a multi-species pastured livestock system. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 544984. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544984
  38. Salazar-Sosa, E., Trejo-Escareño, H. I., López-Martínez, J. D., Vázquez-Vázquez, C., Serrato-Corona, J. S., Orona-Castillo, I., & Flores-Márgez, J. P. (2010). Efecto residual de estiércol bovino sobre el rendimiento de maíz forrajero y propiedades del suelo. Terra Latinoamericana, 28(4), 381-390
  39. Sanderman, J., Hengl, T., & Fiske, G. J. (2017). Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 114(36), 9575–9580. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706103114
  40. Schreefel, L., Schulte, R. P., De Boer, I. J. M., Schrijver, A. P., & Van Zanten, H. H. E. (2020). Regenerative agriculture–the soil is the base. Global Food Security, 26, 100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100404
  41. Singh, S., Devi, N. B., Divya, D., Kumar, A., Singh, S., Tyagi, G., & Kumar, A. (2024). Soil fertility management: Role of organic amendments and bio-fertilizers: A review. International Journal of Research in Agronomy, 7(12), 766-772. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i12j.2253
  42. Smith, P., Soussana, J. F., Angers, D., Schipper, L., Chenu, C., Rasse, D. P., Batjes, N., van Egmond, F., McNeill, S., Kuhnert, M., Arias-Navarro, C., Olesen, J., Chirinda, N., Fornara, D., Wollenberg, E., Álvaro-Fuentes, J., Sanz-Cobena, A., & Klumpp, K. (2023). How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal. Global Change Biology, 26(1), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14815
  43. Soro, D., Ayolié, K., Zro, F. G. B., Yéboua, F. Y., Kouadio, H. K. K., Bakayoko, S., Angui, P. T., & Kouadio, J. Y. (2015). Impact of organic fertilization on maize (Zea mays L.) production in a ferralitic soil of centre-west Côte d'Ivoire. Journal of experimental biology and Agricultural Sciences, 3(6), 556-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.18006/2015.3(6).556.565
  44. Stagnari, F., Maggio, A., Galieni, A., & Pisante, M. (2017). Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: an overview. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 4, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-016-0085-1
  45. Tapia, J. J., Atencio, L. M., Ramírez, J., Osorio, K. V., Castillo, J., & Mejía, S. (2020). Situación actual y avances tecnológicos para mejorar la productividad del cultivo de maíz (Zea mays L.) en Colombia. ACI Avances en Ciencias e Ingenierías, 14(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v14i1.2585
  46. Terán-Chaves, C. A., Duarte-Carvajalino, J. M., Ipaz-Cuastumal, C., Vega-Amante, A., & Polo-Murcia, S. M. (2023). Assessing the vulnerability of maize crop productivity to precipitation anomalies: A case study in the semiarid region of Cesar, Colombia. Water, 15(11), 2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15112108
  47. Thierfelder, C., Baudron, F., Setimela, P., Nyagumbo, I., Mupangwa, W., Mhlanga, B., Lee, N., & Gerard, B. (2018). Complementary practices supporting conservation agriculture in southern Africa: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 38, 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0492-8
  48. Verhulst, N., Sayre, K., & Govaerts, B. (2012). Manual de Determinación de Rendimiento (1st ed.). SAGARPA, CIMMYT. https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3c50e668-ebe9-42d2-b6ca-651ba7ca492e/content
  49. Villach, Q. G. (2023). La agricultura regenerativa: Regeneración del suelo. Sostenible o Sustentable. (accessed 28 June 2023). https://sostenibleosustentable.com/es/medioambiente/la-agricultura-regenerativa-regeneracion-del-suelo/#origen-de-laagricultura-regenerativa
  50. White, C. (2020). Why regenerative agriculture?. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 79(3), 799-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12334
  51. Yitbarek, M. B. (2019). Livestock and livestock product trends by 2050. International Journal of Animal Research, 4, 30.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.