contadores
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Research Article

Vol. 41 No. 3 (2024): Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas - Tercer cuatrimestre, Septiembre - Diciembre 2024

Agroecology and local development in coffee communities of the Colombian Coffee Cultural Landscape

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.20244103.246
Submitted
February 21, 2024
Published
2024-12-30

Abstract

This article delves into the sociocultural determinants driving local development, focusing on coffee-growing communities in southwestern Colombia. Through interviews, focus groups, and participant observation, a detailed analysis is conducted in a region globally recognized for its cultural and environmental significance. The findings highlight the benefits of traditional agroecological systems, which contribute to environmental conservation, economic development, and community strengthening. Based on our findings, we can conclude that agroecology and cultural identity are key elements for the sustainability of the coffee cultural landscape, reinforcing the relevance of collaboration among local actors and the design of public policies focused on these practices.

References

  1. Alfonso, J. D.; Barros, S.; Albert, I. (2023). The sense of belonging in the context of migration: Development and trajectories regarding Portuguese migrants in Luxembourg. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. 57(2): 518–546. 10.1007/s12124-022-09721-4
  2. Altieri, M. A.; Nicholls, C. I. (2020). Agroecology and the reconstruction of post COVID-19 agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 47(5): 881-898. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1782891
  3. Apablazza, G. F.; Basso, D.; Plein, C. (2023). Agroecological innovations, social technologies and family farming: A review. Revista Estudios de Políticas Públicas. 9(1): 64-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-6296.2023.68618
  4. Aparicio, V. C.; de Gerónimo, E.; Saneugenio, F. E.; Cerdà, A.; Costa, J. L. (2023). Plaguicidas en aguas de consumo humano en el sursudeste de la región pampeana Argentina. In: Arnáez, J.; Ruiz-Flaño, P.; Pascual-Bellido, N.E.; Lana-Renault, N.; Lorenzo- Lacruz, J.; Angulo, A.; Martín-Hernández, N.; Lasanta, T.; Nadal-Romero, E. (eds). Geografía: Cambios, Retos y Adaptación. Actas del XXVIII Congreso de la Asociación Española de Geografía Logroño, 12 al 14 de septiembre de 2023. pp. 665-674. Universidad de La Rioja. p1780
  5. Barrios, E.; Gemmill-Herren, B.; Bicksler, A.; Siliprandi, E.; Brathwaite, R.; Moller, S.; Batello, C.; Tittonell, P. (2020). The 10 elements of agroecology: Enabling transitions to sustainable agriculture and food systems through visual narratives. Ecosystems and People. 16(1): 230-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1808705
  6. Bedeke, S. B. (2023). Vulnerability to climate change and adaptation of crop producers in sub-Saharan Africa: A review of concepts, approaches, and methods. Environmental Development and Sustainability. 25: 1017–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02118-8
  7. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H. (2022). Impacts of the Russia-Ukraine War on global food security: Towards more sustainable and resilient food systems?. Foods. 11(15): 2301. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152301
  8. Bhardwaj, M.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, S.; Dagar, V; Kumar A. (2022). A district-level analysis to measure the effects of climate change on the production of agricultural crops, i.e., wheat and rice: Evidence from India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(21): 31861–31885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17994-2
  9. Borras, S. M. (2023). Politically engaged, pluralist and internationalist: Critical agrarian studies today. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 50(2): 449-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2163164
  10. Cabell, J. F.; Oelofse, M. (2012). An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecology and Society. 17(1): 18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04666-170118
  11. Cañedo Villarreal, R.; Barragán, M. del C.; Esparza, J. C. (2021). The construction of networks of entities in the social and solidarity economy at the local level. Sobre México Temas De Economía. 2(E): 45-75.
  12. Cepeda Ortega, J. (2018). An approach to the concept of cultural identity based on experiences: Heritage and education. Tabanque. 31: 244-262. https://doi.org/10.24197/trp.31.2018.244-262
  13. Clapp, J. (2023). Concentration and crises: Exploring the deep roots of vulnerability in the global industrial food system. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 50(1): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2129013
  14. Da Silva, K. N.; Capellaro, L. G.; Ueda, C. N.; Rodríguez, N.; Pertile, A.; Martins, R.; Latini, A.; Glaser, V. (2020). Glyphosate-based herbicide impairs energy metabolism and increases autophagy in C6 astroglioma cell line. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. 83(4). 10.1080/15287394.2020.1731897
  15. Darmaun, M.; Chevallier, T.; Hossard, L.; Lairez, J.; Scopel, E.; Chotte, J.; Lambert-Derkimba, A.; De Tourdonnet, S. (2023). Multidimensional and multiscale assessment of agroecological transitions: A review. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 21(1): 2193028 https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2193028
  16. Dobkowitz, S.; Walz, A.; Baroni, B.; Perez-Marin, A. M. (2020). Cross-scale vulnerability assessment for smallholder farming: A case study from the northeast of Brazil. Sustainability. 12(9): 3787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093787
  17. Fabinyi, M.; Ebans, L.; Foale, S. (2014). Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: Insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecology and Society. 19(4): 28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07029-190428
  18. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. (2021). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4474en
  19. Gadea, C. A. (2018). Symbolic interactionism and its links to studies on culture and power in contemporaneity. Sociológica. 33(95): 39-64.
  20. Giraldo, O. F.; Roset, P. M. (2017). Agroecology as a territory in dispute: Between institutionality and social movements. Journal of Peasant Studies. 45(3): 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1353496
  21. Gonzalo Mayoral, E. S.; Aparicio, V. C.; De Gerónimo, E.; Fernandes, G.; Rheinheimer dos Santos, D.; Costa, J. L. (2022). Glyphosate, AMPA, and metsulfuron-methyl retention in the main horizons of a Typic Argiudoll. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. 57(7): 526-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2022.2069982
  22. Goulet, F. (2020). Family farming and the emergence of an alternative sociotechnical imaginary in Argentina. Science, Technology and Society. 25(1): 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721819889920
  23. Guzmán Luna, A.; Ferguson, B.; Schmook, B.; Giraldo, O. F.; Aldasoro Maya, E. (2019). Territorial resilience: The third dimension of agroecological upscaling: Approaches based on three peasant experiences in southern Mexico. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 43(7-8): 764-784.https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2019.1622619
  24. Iyabano, A.; Klerkx, L.; Leeuwis, C. (2023). Why and how do farmers’ organizations get involved in the promotion of agroecological techniques? Insights from Burkina Faso. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 47(4): 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2164881
  25. Karytsas, S.; Theodoropoulou, E. (2022). Determinants of citizens' participation in community energy initiatives. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 41(11): 1836-1848. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2022.2118277
  26. Levidow, L.; Sansolo, D.; Schiavinatto, M. (2021). Agroecological innovation constructing socionatural order for social transformation: two case studies in Brazil. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society. 4(1): 1843318. 10.1080/25729861.2020.1843318.
  27. Martínez Carazo, P. C. (2006). El método de estudio de caso Estrategia metodológica de la investigación científica. Revista Pensamiento & Gestión. (20). 165-193.
  28. Mees, H. L. P. (2022). Why do citizens engage in climate action? A comprehensive framework of individual conditions and a proposed research approach. Environmental Policy and Governance. 32(3): 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1981
  29. Molano, O. L. (2007). Identidad cultural un concepto que evoluciona. Opera. 7(7): 69-84.
  30. Myhre, G.; Shindell, D.; Bréon, F.M.; Collins, W.; Fuglestvedt, J.; Huang, J.; Koch, D.; Lamarque, J.F.; Lee, D.; Mendoza, B.; Nakajima, T.; Robock, A.; Stephens, G.; Takemura, T.; Zhang, H. (2013): Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: Stocker, T.F.; D. Qin, G.K.; Plattner, M.; Tignor, S.K. Allen, J.; Boschung, A.; Nauels, Y.; Xia, V.; Bex; Midgley, P.M. (eds). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp. 659-740. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1535p.
  31. Palacios, M. (2009). El café en Colombia, 1850-1970: una historia económica, social y política. 4th ed. El Colegio de Mexico. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv47w55p
  32. Perafán Cabrera, A., & Restrepo Jiménez, L. M. (2023) Caracterización de la caficultura en Trujillo, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Ciencia Nueva, Revista De Historia Y Política. 7(2): 29–54. https://doi.org/10.22517/25392662.25300
  33. Rincón, F. (2016). Paisajiando ando la arquitectura y cultura cafeteria. NOVUM. Revista de Ciencias Sociales Aplicadas (6): 123–135.
  34. Rosa, L. (2022). Adapting agriculture to climate change via sustainable irrigation: biophysical potentials and feedbacks. Environmental Research Letters. 17(6): 063008. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7408
  35. Ruzzante, S., Labarta, R., Bilton, A. (2021) Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. World Development. 146: 105599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105599
  36. Sánchez, L.; Reyes, O. (2015). Medidas de adaptación y mitigación del cambio climático en América Latina y el Caribe: una revisión general. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/39781
  37. Sidhu, S; Manickavasagan, A (2023). Nondestructive testing methods for pesticide residue in food commodities: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 22(2): 1226-1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.13109
  38. Soeiro, S.; Ferreira Dias, M. (2020). Renewable energy community and the European energy market: main motivations. Heliyon, 6(7): e04511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105599
  39. Steensland, A. (2022). 2022 Global Agricultural Productivity Report: Troublesome trends and system shocks. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/116270
  40. Sylvester, O.; Little M. (2021) "I came here for training, is it really going to teach me a woman?" Factors that support and hinder women's participation in agroecology in Costa Rica. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 45:7. 957-980. 10.1080/21683565.2020.1811830
  41. Taboada, M. Á; Costantini, A. O; Busto, M; Bonatti, M; Sieber, S. (2021). Climate change adaptation and the agricultural sector in South American countries: Risk, vulnerabilities and opportunities. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 45: e0210072. https://doi.org/10.36783/18069657rbcs20210072
  42. Takahashi, K.; Muraoka, R.; Otsuka, K. (2020) Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature. Agricultural Economics. 51(1): 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12539
  43. Thomas, H; Becerra, L; Juarez, P. (2021). Deepening the field, raising the stakes: Generating technologies for inclusive and sustainable development. In: Lee, G.; Zuiderent-Jerak, T.(eds). Making & Doing Activating STS through Knowledge Expression and Travel. pp. 95–116. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. p.284
  44. Van der Ploeg, J. D. (2020). The political economy of agroecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 48(2): 274–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1725489
  45. Zou, M. S; Huang, M; Zhang J. Y; Chen, R (2022). Exploring the effects and mechanisms of organophosphorus pesticide exposure and hearing loss. Frontiers in Public Health. 10: 1001760. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1001760

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.