La perdurabilidad empresarial de los emprendimientos sociales: revisión sistemática y perspectivas de investigación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.242501.249Palabras clave:
desarrollo económico y social, equilibrio económico, financiación, resolución de problemasResumen
La revisión sistemática de literatura que se presenta en este artículo, tiene como propósito, evidenciar la evolución, relevancia, importancia y perspectivas de investigación de la perdurabilidad empresarial de los emprendimientos sociales. Este estudio bibliográfico, que siguió lo establecido en la declaración PRISMA, utilizó el software Publish or Perish para el rastreo de la literatura en WoS, Scopus y Google Scholar, al igual que criterios de inclusión y exclusión que permitieron la eliminación de duplicados y la selección de los documentos por relevancia y subáreas; mientras que, la utilización de herramientas como Rstudio, ToS, Gephi y Bibliometrix, posibilitó el análisis de la evolución e importancia del material bibliográfico, como también, la identificación de las redes de colaboración y las perspectivas de investigación. Los resultados evidencian un crecimiento de la productividad académica y la existencia de tres grandes perspectivas que giran en torno a los problemas y oportunidades de la perdurabilidad empresarial de estos emprendimientos. Asimismo, se logró identificar vacíos investigativos que dan apertura a futuros trabajos.
Descargas
Citas
(1) Agnusdei, G. P. & Coluccia, B. (2022). Sustainable agrifood supply chains: Bibliometric, network and content analyses. Science of the Total Environment, 824, 153704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153704
(2) Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
(3) Arru, B. (2020). An integrative model for understanding the sustainable entrepreneurs’ behavioural intentions: an empirical study of the Italian context. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 3519–3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00356-x
(4) Austin, J., Stevenson, H. & Wei, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
(5) Bacq, S. & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(5-6), 373-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.577242
(6) Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 361-362. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
(7) Battilana, J. & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
(8) Belz, F. M. & Binder, J. K. (2015). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887
(9) Bertoni, M. (2017). Introducing sustainability in value models to support design decision making: A systematic review. Sustainability, 9(6), 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060994
(10) Bocken, N. M., Short, S., Rana, P. & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
(11) Boons, F. & Lüdeke, F. F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
(12) Brehmer, M., Podoynitsyna, K. & Langerak, F. (2018). Sustainable business models as boundary-spanning systems of value transfers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4514–4531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.083
(13) Buitrago, S., Duque, P. y Robledo, S. (2019). Branding Corporativo: una revisión bibliográfica. Económicas CUC, 41(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.1
(14) Campos, V., Sanchis, J. R. & Ejarque, A. (2019). Social entrepreneurship and Economy for the Common Good: Study of their relationship through a bibliometric analysis. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 21(3), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750319879632
(15) Carbonell, A. A., Romero, L. J. & Gertrudix, M. (2021). A methodological assessment based on a systematic review of circular economy and bioenergy addressed by education and communication. Sustainability, 13(8), 4273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084273
(16) Chaarani, H. & Raimi, L. (2022). Determinant factors of successful social entrepreneurship in the emerging circular economy of Lebanon: exploring the moderating role of NGOs. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(5), 874-901.
(17) Cohen, B. & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001
(18) Corner, P. & Ho, M. (2010). How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00382.x
(19) Dalborg, C. & Friedrichs, Y. (2021). The role of business advisers in supporting social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 17(2) 280-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-12-2019-0102
(20) Davies, I. A. & Chambers, L. (2018). Integrating hybridity and business model theory in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.196
(21) Dean, T. J. & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003
(22) Dentchev, N., Rauter, R., Jóhannsdóttir, L., Snihur, Y., Rosano, M., Baumgartner, R., Nyberg, T., Tang, X., Hoof, B. & Jonker, J. (2018). Embracing the variety of sustainable business models: A prolific field of research and a future research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.156
(23) Di, V. A., Hassan, R., Chhabra, M., Arrigo, E. & Palladino, R. (2022). Sustainable entrepreneurship impact and entrepreneurial venture life cycle: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134469
(24) Doherty, B. & Kittipanya, N. P. (2021). The role of social enterprise hybrid business models in inclusive value chain development. Sustainability, 13(2), 499.
(25) Doherty, B., Haugh, H. & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
(26) Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J. & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001
(27) Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy - A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
(28) Gil, L. M. & Latorre, M. M. (2022). The circular economy and sustainability: a systematic literature review. Cuadernos de Gestión, 22(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211492mg
(29) Granados, M. L., Hlupic, V., Coakes, E. & Mohamed, S. (2011). Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship research and theory: A bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2010. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(3), 198-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111182368
(30) Gray, B., Kirkwood, J., Etemaddar, M. & Monahan, E. (2018). Sustainable business models for community-based enterprises in Samoa and Tonga. Small Enterprise Research, 25(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2018.1479293
(31) Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C. & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA 2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimized digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
(32) Haigh, N. & Hoffman, A. J. (2014). The new heretics: hybrid organizations and the challenges they present to corporate sustainability. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614545345
(33) Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A. & Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.002
(34) Henry, M., Bauwens, T., Hekkert, M. & Kirchherr, J. (2020). A typology of circular start-ups – An analysis of 128 circular business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118528
(35) Hestad, D., Tàbara, J. D. & Thornton, T. F. (2020). Transcending unsustainable dichotomies in management: lessons from sustainability-oriented hybrid organisations in Barcelona. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118766
(36) Jacsó, P. (2009). Calculating the h-index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators from Google Scholar with the Publish or Perish software. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1189-1200. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520911011070
(37) Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
(38) Kulshrestha, R., Sahay, A. & Sengupta, S. (2022). Constituents and drivers of mission engagement for social enterprise sustainability: A systematic review. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 31(1), 90-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557211069301
(39) Landínez, D. y Montoya, D. (2019). Políticas de salud pública para la prevención y el tratamiento de la enfermedad vascular cerebral: una revisión sistemática por medio de la metodología ToS (Tree of Science). Medicina UPB, 38(2), 129–139.
(40) Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M. & Singh, A. K. (2019). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
(41) Mahapatra, A. & Sharma, P. (2020). Education in times of COVID-19 pandemic: Academic stress and its psychosocial impact on children and adolescents in India. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(4), 397-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020961801
(42) Mair, J. & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
(43) Manea, D. I., Istudor, N., Dinu, V. & Paraschiv, D. M. (2021). Circular economy and innovative entrepreneurship, prerequisites for social progress. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(5), 1342–1359. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.15547
(44) Monteiro, A. A., Sánchez, J. C., Hernández, B. R. & Cardella, G. M. (2022). Social entrepreneurship conceptual approaches. Encyclopedia, 2(2), 1004-1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2020066
(45) Moral, M. J., Herrera, V. E., Santisteban, E. A. & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de la Información, 29(1), 78-98. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
(46) Moyano, L. G. (2021). La reincorporación económica de los excombatientes de las FARC-EP en el departamento de Caldas. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80729
(47) Moyano, L. G. (2022). Emprendimiento en zonas de post-conflicto: una revisión bibliográfica. ECONÓMICAS CUC, 44(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.44.1.2023.Org.4
(48) Pache, A. C. & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
(49) Pacheco, D. F., Dean, T. J. & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006
(50) Palomares, A. I., Barnett, M., Layrisse, F. & Husted, B. W. (2018). Built to scale? How sustainable business models can better serve the base of the pyramid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4506–4513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.084
(51) Provasnek, A. K., Schmid, E., Geissler, B. & Steiner, G. (2016). Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship: performance and strategies toward innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1934
(52) Robledo, S., Osorio, G. y López, C. (2014). Networking en pequeña empresa: una revisión bibliográfica utilizando la teoría de grafos. Revista Vínculos, 11(2), 6-16.
(53) Roleders, V., Oriekhova, T. & Zaharieva, G. (2022). Circular economy as a model of achieving sustainable development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.19
(54) Sassmannshausen, S. P. & Volkmann, C. (2018). The scientometrics of social entrepreneurship and its establishment as an academic field. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(2), 251-273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12254
(55) Schaltegger, S., Harms, D., Windolph, S. & Hörisch, J. (2014). Involving corporate functions: who contributes to sustainable development? Sustainability, 6(5), 3064–3085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6053064
(56) Schoneveld, G. C. (2020). Sustainable business models for inclusive growth: Towards a conceptual foundation of inclusive business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 124062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124062
(57) Shepherd, D. A. & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x
(58) Siegner, M., Pinkse, J. & Panwar, R. (2018). Managing tensions in a social enterprise: The complex balancing act to deliver a multi-faceted but coherent social mission. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1314–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.076
(59) Smitskikh, K., Titova, N. & Shumik, E. (2020). The model of social entrepreneurship dynamic development in circular economy. Universidad y Sociedad, 12(5), 248-253. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/1705
(60) Stubbs, W. & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “Sustainability Business Model.” Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042
(61) Suchek, N., Ferreira, J. J. & Fernandes, P. O. (2022). A review of entrepreneurship and circular economy research: State of the art and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2256-2283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3020
(62) Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
(63) Trejos, S. D., Duque, H. P., Montoya, R. L. y Montoya, R. I. (2021). Neuroeconomía: una revisión basada en técnicas de mapeo científico. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 11(2), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n2.2021.12754
(64) Velásquez, J. D. (2014). Una guía corta para escribir Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura, Parte 2. Dyna, 81(188), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n188.47872
(65) Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z. & Lv, T. (2020). A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land, 9(1), 28.
(66) Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O. & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
(67) Zott, C., Amit, R. & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.
(68) Zuluaga, A. P., Useche, R. D. y Rojas, B. S. (2023). Relevancia, evolución y tendencias de la supervivencia empresarial. Una revisión de literatura en finanzas. Tendencias, 24(1), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.222302.223
(69) Zuluaga, M., Robledo, S., Arbelaez, E. O., Osorio, Z. & Duque, M. N. (2022). Tree of Science - ToS: A web-based tool for scientific literature recommendation. Issues In Science And Technology Librarianship, (100). https://dx.doi.org/10.29173/istl2696
(70) Zuluaga, M., Robledo, S., Osorio, Z. G., Yathe, L., González, D. & Taborda, G. (2016). Metabolomics and pesticides: systematic literature review using graph theory for analysis of references. Nova, 14(25), 121-138. https://dx.doi.org/10.22490/24629448.1735
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
Esta revista está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional License. Los artículos se pueden copiar, distribuir, adaptar y comunicar públicamente, siempre y cuando se reconozcan los créditos de la obra y se cite la respectiva fuente. Esta obra no puede ser utilizada con fines comerciales.
Para aumentar su visibilidad, los documentos se envían a bases de datos y sistemas de indización.
El contenido de los artículos es responsabilidad de cada autor y no compromete, de ninguna manera, a la revista o a la institución.
