A perdurabilidade empresarial das empreendedorismo social: revisão sistemática e perspectivas de investigação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.242501.249Palavras-chave:
desenvolvimento económico e social, equilíbrio económico, financiamento, resolução de problemasResumo
A revisão sistemática da literatura apresentada neste artigo tem como objetivo destacar a evolução, relevância, importância e perspectivas de investigação da durabilidade empresarial das empresas sociais. Este estudo bibliográfico, que seguiu o estabelecido na declaração PRISMA, utilizou o software Publish or Perish para busca da literatura no WoS, Scopus e Google Scholar, bem como critérios de inclusão e exclusão que permitiram a eliminação de duplicidades e a seleção dos documentos por relevância e subáreas; enquanto, o uso de ferramentas como Rstudio, ToS, Gephi e Bibliometrix, Possibilitou a análise da evolução e importância do material bibliográfico, bem como a identificação de redes de colaboração e perspectivas de pesquisa. Os resultados mostram um crescimento da produtividade acadêmica e a existência de três grandes perspectivas que giram em torno dos problemas e oportunidades da durabilidade dos negócios desses empreendimentos. Da mesma forma, foi possível identificar lacunas de pesquisa que abrem trabalhos futuros.
Downloads
Referências
(1) Agnusdei, G. P. & Coluccia, B. (2022). Sustainable agrifood supply chains: Bibliometric, network and content analyses. Science of the Total Environment, 824, 153704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153704
(2) Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
(3) Arru, B. (2020). An integrative model for understanding the sustainable entrepreneurs’ behavioural intentions: an empirical study of the Italian context. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 3519–3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00356-x
(4) Austin, J., Stevenson, H. & Wei, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
(5) Bacq, S. & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(5-6), 373-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.577242
(6) Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 361-362. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
(7) Battilana, J. & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
(8) Belz, F. M. & Binder, J. K. (2015). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887
(9) Bertoni, M. (2017). Introducing sustainability in value models to support design decision making: A systematic review. Sustainability, 9(6), 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060994
(10) Bocken, N. M., Short, S., Rana, P. & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
(11) Boons, F. & Lüdeke, F. F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
(12) Brehmer, M., Podoynitsyna, K. & Langerak, F. (2018). Sustainable business models as boundary-spanning systems of value transfers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4514–4531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.083
(13) Buitrago, S., Duque, P. y Robledo, S. (2019). Branding Corporativo: una revisión bibliográfica. Económicas CUC, 41(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.1
(14) Campos, V., Sanchis, J. R. & Ejarque, A. (2019). Social entrepreneurship and Economy for the Common Good: Study of their relationship through a bibliometric analysis. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 21(3), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750319879632
(15) Carbonell, A. A., Romero, L. J. & Gertrudix, M. (2021). A methodological assessment based on a systematic review of circular economy and bioenergy addressed by education and communication. Sustainability, 13(8), 4273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084273
(16) Chaarani, H. & Raimi, L. (2022). Determinant factors of successful social entrepreneurship in the emerging circular economy of Lebanon: exploring the moderating role of NGOs. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(5), 874-901.
(17) Cohen, B. & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001
(18) Corner, P. & Ho, M. (2010). How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00382.x
(19) Dalborg, C. & Friedrichs, Y. (2021). The role of business advisers in supporting social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 17(2) 280-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-12-2019-0102
(20) Davies, I. A. & Chambers, L. (2018). Integrating hybridity and business model theory in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.196
(21) Dean, T. J. & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003
(22) Dentchev, N., Rauter, R., Jóhannsdóttir, L., Snihur, Y., Rosano, M., Baumgartner, R., Nyberg, T., Tang, X., Hoof, B. & Jonker, J. (2018). Embracing the variety of sustainable business models: A prolific field of research and a future research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.156
(23) Di, V. A., Hassan, R., Chhabra, M., Arrigo, E. & Palladino, R. (2022). Sustainable entrepreneurship impact and entrepreneurial venture life cycle: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134469
(24) Doherty, B. & Kittipanya, N. P. (2021). The role of social enterprise hybrid business models in inclusive value chain development. Sustainability, 13(2), 499.
(25) Doherty, B., Haugh, H. & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
(26) Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J. & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001
(27) Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy - A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
(28) Gil, L. M. & Latorre, M. M. (2022). The circular economy and sustainability: a systematic literature review. Cuadernos de Gestión, 22(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211492mg
(29) Granados, M. L., Hlupic, V., Coakes, E. & Mohamed, S. (2011). Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship research and theory: A bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2010. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(3), 198-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111182368
(30) Gray, B., Kirkwood, J., Etemaddar, M. & Monahan, E. (2018). Sustainable business models for community-based enterprises in Samoa and Tonga. Small Enterprise Research, 25(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2018.1479293
(31) Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C. & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA 2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimized digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
(32) Haigh, N. & Hoffman, A. J. (2014). The new heretics: hybrid organizations and the challenges they present to corporate sustainability. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614545345
(33) Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A. & Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.002
(34) Henry, M., Bauwens, T., Hekkert, M. & Kirchherr, J. (2020). A typology of circular start-ups – An analysis of 128 circular business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118528
(35) Hestad, D., Tàbara, J. D. & Thornton, T. F. (2020). Transcending unsustainable dichotomies in management: lessons from sustainability-oriented hybrid organisations in Barcelona. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118766
(36) Jacsó, P. (2009). Calculating the h-index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators from Google Scholar with the Publish or Perish software. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1189-1200. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520911011070
(37) Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
(38) Kulshrestha, R., Sahay, A. & Sengupta, S. (2022). Constituents and drivers of mission engagement for social enterprise sustainability: A systematic review. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 31(1), 90-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557211069301
(39) Landínez, D. y Montoya, D. (2019). Políticas de salud pública para la prevención y el tratamiento de la enfermedad vascular cerebral: una revisión sistemática por medio de la metodología ToS (Tree of Science). Medicina UPB, 38(2), 129–139.
(40) Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M. & Singh, A. K. (2019). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
(41) Mahapatra, A. & Sharma, P. (2020). Education in times of COVID-19 pandemic: Academic stress and its psychosocial impact on children and adolescents in India. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(4), 397-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020961801
(42) Mair, J. & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
(43) Manea, D. I., Istudor, N., Dinu, V. & Paraschiv, D. M. (2021). Circular economy and innovative entrepreneurship, prerequisites for social progress. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(5), 1342–1359. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.15547
(44) Monteiro, A. A., Sánchez, J. C., Hernández, B. R. & Cardella, G. M. (2022). Social entrepreneurship conceptual approaches. Encyclopedia, 2(2), 1004-1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2020066
(45) Moral, M. J., Herrera, V. E., Santisteban, E. A. & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de la Información, 29(1), 78-98. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
(46) Moyano, L. G. (2021). La reincorporación económica de los excombatientes de las FARC-EP en el departamento de Caldas. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80729
(47) Moyano, L. G. (2022). Emprendimiento en zonas de post-conflicto: una revisión bibliográfica. ECONÓMICAS CUC, 44(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.44.1.2023.Org.4
(48) Pache, A. C. & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
(49) Pacheco, D. F., Dean, T. J. & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006
(50) Palomares, A. I., Barnett, M., Layrisse, F. & Husted, B. W. (2018). Built to scale? How sustainable business models can better serve the base of the pyramid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4506–4513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.084
(51) Provasnek, A. K., Schmid, E., Geissler, B. & Steiner, G. (2016). Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship: performance and strategies toward innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1934
(52) Robledo, S., Osorio, G. y López, C. (2014). Networking en pequeña empresa: una revisión bibliográfica utilizando la teoría de grafos. Revista Vínculos, 11(2), 6-16.
(53) Roleders, V., Oriekhova, T. & Zaharieva, G. (2022). Circular economy as a model of achieving sustainable development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.19
(54) Sassmannshausen, S. P. & Volkmann, C. (2018). The scientometrics of social entrepreneurship and its establishment as an academic field. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(2), 251-273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12254
(55) Schaltegger, S., Harms, D., Windolph, S. & Hörisch, J. (2014). Involving corporate functions: who contributes to sustainable development? Sustainability, 6(5), 3064–3085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6053064
(56) Schoneveld, G. C. (2020). Sustainable business models for inclusive growth: Towards a conceptual foundation of inclusive business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 124062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124062
(57) Shepherd, D. A. & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x
(58) Siegner, M., Pinkse, J. & Panwar, R. (2018). Managing tensions in a social enterprise: The complex balancing act to deliver a multi-faceted but coherent social mission. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1314–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.076
(59) Smitskikh, K., Titova, N. & Shumik, E. (2020). The model of social entrepreneurship dynamic development in circular economy. Universidad y Sociedad, 12(5), 248-253. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/1705
(60) Stubbs, W. & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “Sustainability Business Model.” Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042
(61) Suchek, N., Ferreira, J. J. & Fernandes, P. O. (2022). A review of entrepreneurship and circular economy research: State of the art and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2256-2283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3020
(62) Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
(63) Trejos, S. D., Duque, H. P., Montoya, R. L. y Montoya, R. I. (2021). Neuroeconomía: una revisión basada en técnicas de mapeo científico. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 11(2), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n2.2021.12754
(64) Velásquez, J. D. (2014). Una guía corta para escribir Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura, Parte 2. Dyna, 81(188), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n188.47872
(65) Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z. & Lv, T. (2020). A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land, 9(1), 28.
(66) Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O. & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
(67) Zott, C., Amit, R. & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.
(68) Zuluaga, A. P., Useche, R. D. y Rojas, B. S. (2023). Relevancia, evolución y tendencias de la supervivencia empresarial. Una revisión de literatura en finanzas. Tendencias, 24(1), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.222302.223
(69) Zuluaga, M., Robledo, S., Arbelaez, E. O., Osorio, Z. & Duque, M. N. (2022). Tree of Science - ToS: A web-based tool for scientific literature recommendation. Issues In Science And Technology Librarianship, (100). https://dx.doi.org/10.29173/istl2696
(70) Zuluaga, M., Robledo, S., Osorio, Z. G., Yathe, L., González, D. & Taborda, G. (2016). Metabolomics and pesticides: systematic literature review using graph theory for analysis of references. Nova, 14(25), 121-138. https://dx.doi.org/10.22490/24629448.1735
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
Esta revista está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional License. Los artículos se pueden copiar, distribuir, adaptar y comunicar públicamente, siempre y cuando se reconozcan los créditos de la obra y se cite la respectiva fuente. Esta obra no puede ser utilizada con fines comerciales.
Para aumentar su visibilidad, los documentos se envían a bases de datos y sistemas de indización.
El contenido de los artículos es responsabilidad de cada autor y no compromete, de ninguna manera, a la revista o a la institución.
