contadores
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Research Article

Vol. 40 No. 3 (2023): Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas - Tercer semestre, Septiembre - Diciembre 2023

Morph-physiology and development of soybean cultivars under irrigation shift

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.20234003.217
Submitted
June 30, 2021
Published
2023-12-19

Abstract

During certain periods of the year, some Brazilian regions impose water restrictions, initiating the growth cycle of the soybean crop. Thus, this work was conducted aiming to evaluate the morphophysiology and development of soybean cultivars under irrigation intervals. The experiment was conduct in January 2021, in a rural property, located in the municipality of Lavínia, state of São Paulo, Brazil. The design was completely randomized, in a 2×5 factorial scheme, with two soybean cultivars, M7110IPro (Monsoy®) and Desafio RR8473RSF (Brasmax®), interacting with the irrigation intervals (i.e., 24 h (Control); 48 h; 72 h, 96 h and 120 h) totalizing 10 treatments. We used four repetitions per treatment, which totalizes 40 plots or pots. Our results revealed that intervals longer than 48 h already negatively influence in morphophysiology of the soybean crop. Intervals of 96 h caused greater negative interferences on plant height (PH); number of leaflets (NL); number of pods (NP); dry mass of aerial part (DMAP) and root (DMR) in the soybean crop when grown in pots. Water stress did not influence the stomatal density of soybean grown in pots. Water stress harms soybean physiological parameters. No soybean cultivar showed tolerance to water stress.

References

  1. Agostinetto, D.; Ruchel, Q.; Fraga, D.S.; Vargas, A.A.M.; Vargas, L. (2020). Water deficit and plant recovery affect interaction between soybean and slender amaranth. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrária. 15(4): 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v15i4a8132
  2. Almeida, G.M.; Costa, A.C.; Batista, P.F.; Junqueira, V.B.; Rodrigues, A.A.; Santos, E.C.D.; Vieira, D.A.; Oliveira, M.M.; Silva, A.A. (2021). Can light intensity modulate the physiological, anatomical, and reproductive responses of soybean plants to water deficit? Physiologia Plantarum. 172(2): 1301-1320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13360
  3. Banzatto, D.A.; Kronka, S.N. (2013). Experimentação Agrícola. 4.ed. Jaboticabal: FUNEP. 237p.
  4. Bortoluzzi, M.P.; Heldwein, A.B.; Trentin, R.; Maldaner, I.C.; Silva, J.R. (2020). Risk of Occurrence of Water Deficit in Soybean Cultivated in Lowland Soils. Earth Interactions. 24(4): 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/ei-d-19-0029.1
  5. Castro, E.M.; Pereira, F.J.; Paiva, R. (2009). Histologia vegetal: estrutura e função de órgãos vegetativos. Lavras: UFLA. 234p.
  6. Cavalcante, W.S.S.; Silva, N.F.; Teixeira, M.B.; Cabral Filho, F.R.; Nascimento, P.E.R.; Corrêa, F.R. (2020). Eficiência dos bioestimulantes no manejo de déficit hídrico na cultura da soja. Irriga. 25(4): 754-763. http://dx.doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2020v25n4p754-763
  7. Chang, F.H.; Troughton, J.H. (1972). Chlorophyll a/b ratios in C3 and C4 plants. Photosynthetica. 6: 57–65.
  8. Chater, C.C.C.; Caine, R.S.; Fleming, A.J.; Gray, J.E. (2017). Origins and Evolution of Stomatal Development. Plant Physiology. 174(2): 624-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00183
  9. Das, A.; Eldakak, M.; Paudel, B.; Kim, D.; Hemmati, H.; Basu, C.; Rohila, J.S. (2016). Leaf Proteome Analysis Reveals Prospective Drought and Heat Stress Response Mechanisms in Soybean. Biomed Research International. 2016: 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6021047
  10. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization; UNESCO - Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (1974). Soil map of the world. 1:5.000.000 legend. V.1. Paris: UNESCO.
  11. Embrapa - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. (2020). A Soja em números (safra 2019/2020). https://www.embrapa.br/soja/cultivos/soja1/dados-economicos
  12. Herooty, Y.; Kutiel, P.B.; Yizhaq, H.; Katz, O. (2020). Soil hydraulic properties and water source-sink relations affect plant rings’ formation and sizes under arid conditions. Flora. 270: 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2020.151664
  13. Katam, R.; Shokri, S.; Murthy, N.; Singh, S.K.; Suravajhala, P.; Khan, M.N.; Bahmani, M.; Sakata, K.; Reddy, K.R. (2020). Proteomics, physiological, and biochemical analysis of cross tolerance mechanisms in response to heat and water stresses in soybean. Plos One. 15(6): 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233905
  14. Lavergne, A.; Sandoval, D.; Hare, V.J.; Graven, H.; Prentice, I.C. (2020). Impacts of soil water stress on the acclimated stomatal limitation of photosynthesis: insights from stable carbon isotope data. Global Change Biology. 26(12): 7158-7172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15364
  15. Lawes, R.A.; Oliver, Y.M.; Huth, N.I. (2019). Optimal Nitrogen Rate Can Be Predicted Using Average Yield and Estimates of Soil Water and Leaf Nitrogen with Infield Experimentation. Agronomy Journal. 111(3): 1155-1164. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.09.0607
  16. Lisboa, L.A.M.; Cavichioli, J.C.; Vitorino, R.; Figueiredo, P.A.; Viana, R.S. (2021). Nutrient suppression in passion fruit species: an approach to leaf development and morphology. Colloquium Agrariae. 17(3): 89-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.5747/ca.2021.v17.n3.a443
  17. Morando, R.; Silva, A.O.; Carvalho, L.C.; Pinheiro, M.P.M.A. (2014). Déficit hídrico: efeito sobre a cultura da soja. Journal of Agronomic Sciences. 3: 114-129.
  18. Nadal, M.; Roig-Oliver, M.; Bota, J.; Flexas, J. (2020). Leaf age-dependent elastic adjustment and photosynthetic performance under drought stress in Arbutus unedo seedlings. Flora. 271: 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2020.151662
  19. Naoe, A.M.L.; Peluzio, J.M.; Campos, L.J.M.; Naoe, L.K.; Silva, R.A. (2020). Co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense in soybean cultivars subjected to water déficit. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 24(2): 89-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v24n2p89-94
  20. Parry, C.; Blonquist Junior, J. M.; Bugbee B. (2014). In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship. Plant, Cell and Environment. 37: 2508–2520. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12324
  21. Rstudio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. http://www.rstudio.com/
  22. Raij, B.; Cantarella, H.; Quaggio, J.A.; Furlani, A.M.C. (1996). Recomendações de adubação e calagem para o Estado de São Paulo. 2.ed. Campinas: IAC. 285p.
  23. Rockwell, F.E.; Holbrook, N.M. (2017). Leaf Hydraulic Architecture and Stomatal Conductance: a functional perspective. Plant Physiology. 174(4): 1996-2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00303
  24. Rosa, V.R.; Silva, A.A.; Brito, D.S.; Pereira Júnior, J.D.; Silva, C.O.; Dal-Bianco, M.; Oliveira, J.A.; Ribeiro, C. (2020). Drought stress during the reproductive stage of two soybean lines. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 55: (1-11). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2020.v55.01736
  25. Rui, Y.; Anderson, C.T. (2016). Functional Analysis of Cellulose and Xyloglucan in the Walls of Stomatal Guard Cells of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 170(3): 1398-1419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01066
  26. Sack, L.; Buckley, T.N. (2016). The Developmental Basis of Stomatal Density and Flux. Plant Physiology.171(4): 2358-2363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00476
  27. Sant'Ana, E.V.P; Santos, A.B.; Silveira, P.M. (2010). Adubação nitrogenada na produtividade, leitura SPAD e teor de nitrogênio em folhas de feijoeiro. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical. 40(4): 491-496. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632010000400012
  28. Segatto, F.B.; Bisognin, D.A.; Benedetti, M.; Costa, L.C.; Rampelotto, M.V.; Nicoloso, F.T. (2004). Técnica para o estudo da anatomia da epiderme foliar de batata. Ciência Rural. 5: 1597-1601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-84782004000500042
  29. Silva, J.A.; Santos, P.A.B.; Carvalho, L.G.; Moura, E.G; Andrade, F.R. (2020). Gas exchanges and growth of soybean cultivars submitted to water deficiency. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical. 50: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632020v5058854
  30. Silva, J.N.; Pereira, L.S.; Sousa, G.D.; Oliveira, G.S.; Jakelaitis, A. (2019). Coexistence of soybean plants and Urochloa spp. under glyphosate and water deficit effects. Científica. 47(1): 36-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2019v47n1p36-45
  31. Suriadi, A.; Zulhaedar, F.; Nazam, M.; Hipi, A. (2021). Optimal irrigation at various soil types for soybean production. Iop Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 648(1): 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/648/1/012081
  32. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E.; Moller, I.; Murphy, A. (2017). Fisiologia e desenvolvimento vegetal. 6.ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed. 888 p.
  33. Viçosi, K.A.; Ferreira, A.A.S.; Oliveira, L.A.B.; Rodrigues, F. (2017). Estresse hídrico simulado em genótipos de feijão, milho e soja. Journal of Neotropical Agriculture. 4(5): 36-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.32404/rean.v4i5.2194
  34. Wijewardana, C.; Alsajri, F.A.; Irby, J.T.; Krutz, L.J.; Golden, B.; Henry, W.B.; Gao, W.; Reddy, K.R. (2019). Physiological assessment of water deficit in soybean using midday leaf water potential and spectral features. Journal of Plant Interactions. 14(1): 533-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2019.1662499

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.