Carbon storage potential of windbreaks in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.1936E.111Palabras clave:
Agroforestry systems, shelterbelts, biomass, windbreak designs, climate changeResumen
In the United States of America, agriculture is performed on large farms of monocultures, affecting ecosystems and making a great contribution to climate change. The carbon storage potential for twelve field windbreak designs containing one-, two- and three-rows and nine farmstead windbreaks encompassing three- to ten-rows of mixed tree species were analyzed in nine regions: Northern Lake States (NLS), Corn Belt (CB), Southern Plains (SP), Delta States (DS), Appalachia (AP), Rocky Mountains North (RMN), Rocky Mountains South (RMS), North East (NE), y Northern Plains (NP), using the US Forest Inventory and Analysis database and allometric equations. Carbon storage potentials for different field windbreak designs across regions ranged from 0.3 Mg C km-1 yr-1 for a single-row small-conifer windbreak in the Northeast region to 5.8 Mg C km-1 yr-1 for a three-row tall-deciduous windbreak in the Appalachia region. Carbon storage potentials for farmstead windbreaks ranged from 0.8 Mg C 300 m-1 yr-1 for a three-row of mixed tree species windbreak in the Rocky Mountain North to 12.7 Mg C 300-1 yr-1 for a ten-row of mixed tree species windbreak in Delta States region.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
Amicheva, B.Y., Murray J.B., Werner A.K., Colin, P.L., Suren, K.J. Piwoward, J.M. & Van Rees K, C.J. (2016). Carbon sequestration by white spruce shelterbelts in Saskatchewan, Canada: 3PG and CBM-CFS3 model simulations. Ecological Modelling. 325: 35-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.01.003
Bailey, R.G. (1995). Description of the ecoregions of the United States. 2nd ed.(map). Washington DC: Miscellaneous Publication. 1391:126p.
Ballesteros, W. (2015). Carbon storage potential of windbreaks on agricultural lands of the continental United States. Recovered from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1119&context=natresdiss
Brandle, J.R., Hintz, D.L. & Sturrock, J.W. (1988). Windbreak Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. 598p.
Brandle, J.R., Hodges, L., Tyndall, J. & Sudmeyer, R.A. (2009). Windbreak practices. In: Garrett, H.E. (ed.). North American Agroforestry, an integrated science and practice. 75-104 p. 2nd edition. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.
Brandle, J.R., Wardle, T.D. & Bratton, G.F. (1992). Opportunities to increase tree planting in shelterbelts and the potential impacts on carbon storage and conservation. In: Sampson, R.N. & Dwight, H. (eds). Forests and Global Change, Vol. 1: Opportunities for Increasing Forest Cover. Washington: American Forests. 157-176p.
Burns, R.M. & Barbara H.H. (1990). Silvics of North America: Hardwoods. vol. 2. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 877 p.
Burns, R.M. & Honkala, B.H. (1990). Silvics of North America: Hardwoods. First edition. Washington: Forest Service. 876 p.
Dixon, R.K. (1995). Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases?. Agroforestry Systems. 31: 99-16.
Follet, R., Mooney, S., Morgan, J., Paustian, K., Allen, L.H., Archibelgue, S., Baker, J.M., Del Grosso, S.J., Derner, J., Dijkstra, F., Franzlubbers, A.J., Jansen, H., Kurkalova, L.A., McCarl., Ogle, S., Parton, W.J., Rice, C.W., Roberston, G.P., Schoenenberger, M., West, T.O. & Williams, J. (2011). Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas fluxes in agriculture: Challenges and opportunities. First edition. Ames, Iowa, USA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology- CAST-. 106 p.
Jenkins, J.C., Chojnacky, D. C., Heat, L.S. & Birdsey, R.A. (2003). Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species. United States: Forest service, USDA- United States Department of Agriculture. 48p.
Kort, J. (1988). Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 22-23:165-190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90017-5
Kort, J. & Turnock, R. (1999). Carbon reservoir and biomass in Canadian prairie shelterbelts. Agroforestry Systems. 44:175-189.
Kulshreshtha, S. & Kort, J. (2009). External economic benefits and social goods from prairie shelterbelts. Agroforestry Systems. 75(1): 39-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9126-5
Nair, P.K.R, Nair, V.D., Kumar B.M. & Showalter, J. (2010). Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv. Agron. 108: 237-307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)08005-3
Nair, P.K.R. & Nair, V.D. (2003). Carbon Storage in North American agroforestry systems, pp. 333-346. In: Kimble, J.M., Heath, L.S., Birdsey, R.A. & Lal, R. (eds), The Potential of U.S. Forest Soils to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC.
Nair, P.K.R. (2011). Agroforestry systems and environmental quality: introduction. J. Environ Qual. 40(3):784-90. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0076.
Newman, M.C. (1993). Regression analysis of log‐transformed data: Statistical bias and its correction. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 12:1129-1133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620120618
Oliver, W.W. & Russell, A.R. (1990). Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws.) In: Burns, Russell M., & Barbara H. Silvics of North America. Conifers. vol. 1. Washington: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 654 p.
Sauer, T.J., Cambardella, C.A. & Brandle, J.R. (2007) Soil carbon and litter dynamics in a red cedar-scotch pine shelterbelt. Agroforest Syst. 71:163-174
Schoeneberger, M.M. (2009) Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agroforest Syst. 75:27-37
Schoeneberger, M.M., Bentrup, G., de Gooijer, H., Soolanayakanahally, R., Sauer, T., Brandle, J., Zhou, X. & Current, D. (2012). Branching out: Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation and adaptation tool for agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 67(5): 128-136.
Tamang, B. Andreou, G.M., Friedman, H.M. & Rockwood, D.L. (2015). Windbreak designs and planting for Florida agricultural fields. Retrieved from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fr289
Tyndall, J. & Colletti, J. (2007). Mitigating swine odor with strategically designed shelterbelt systems: a review. Agroforest Syst. 69:45-65. doi: 10.1007/s10457-006-9017-6
Udawatta, R.P. & Jose, S. (2011). Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry practices in temperate North America. In: Kumar, B.M. & Nair, P.K.R. (eds.). Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges. pp. 17 -42. First edition. New York, USA: Springer. 307 p.
USDA-FIA - Forest Inventory Analysis. (2019). Forest Inventory and Analysis National Program: FIA Library. Recovered from https://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/database-documentation/
USDA-FS (Forest Service). (2014). Ecoregions of the United States. Recovered from http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/ecoregions/products/map-ecoregions-united-states/
USDA-FS (Forest Service). (2015). Forest Inventory and Analysis National Program: FIA Library. Database documentation. Recovered from http://fia.fs.fed.us/library/database- documentation/
USDA-NRCS - USDA - Natural Resource Conservation Service. (2009). Conservation practice standard: windbreak/shelterbelt establishment (Feet) Code 380. Retrieved from http://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/MN/380mn.pdf
USDA-NRCS, - USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service. (2006). Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific basin. United States: Department of Agriculture Handbook. 296 p.
Zhou, X., Brandle, R.J., Schoeneberger, M.M. & Awada, T.N. (2007). Developing above-ground woody biomass equations for open-grown, multiple-stemmed tree species: Shelterbelt-grown Russian-olive. Forest Ecological Modelling. 202: 311-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.024
