contadores
Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé

Research Article

v. 42 n. 3 (2025): Vol. 42 Núm. 3 (2025): Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas - Septiembre - Diciembre 2025

Community capitals, agricultural productivity, and household well-being in smallholder sugarcane systems

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.20254203.281
Enviado
maio 13, 2025
Publicado
2025-12-27

Resumo

The cultivation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) for panela production is a key livelihood source for rural households in Colombia, particularly in the southwestern region of the country. Understanding the subsistence strategies associated with this activity and their connection to rural well-being is essential for promoting sustainable productive development.  This study examine the influence of community capitals on the well-being of 92 panela-producing households, categorized into three livelihood typologies: (i) diversified, (ii) innovative, and (iii) traditional. Correlations between these typologies and various forms of community capital, human, social, built, natural, financial, political, and cultural, were assessed to identify shared patterns in livelihoods. Diversified households (55.9%) engage in multiple economic activities, including coffee, avocado, and sugarcane cultivation, along with livestock and pig farming. Innovative households (28.3%) primarily depend on sugarcane cultivation, whereas traditional households (11.9%) exhibit low productivity and rely predominantly on coffee as their main income source. The findings revealed that differentiated access to and management of community capitals significantly affect household well-being, with integrated and diversified strategies yielding better outcomes. Furthermore, strengthening skills, knowledge, and networking capacities is crucial for enhancing the social appropriation of sugarcane-related knowledge. This, in turn, can guide more effective strategies for the development of the panela sector and contribute to the overall well-being of rural farming households.

Referências

  1. Alarcón, A. L.; Palacios, L. M.; Osorio, C.; César Narváez, P.; Heredia, F. J; Orjuela, A; Hernanz, D. (2021). Chemical characteristics and colorimetric properties of non-centrifugal cane sugar (“panela”) obtained via different processing technologies. Food Chemistry. 340: 128183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128183
  2. Allaire, J. (2024). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. https://www.r-project.org/conferences/useR-2011/abstracts/180111-allairejj.pdf
  3. Alvarado, J. P; Palma, H; Ramos, C; Moreno, A; Osio, E; Horta, R; Caraveo, G; Moreno, S. (2024). Evaporation automation at the Central de Mieles de Útica, Colombia, for non-centrifugal sugar cane production: Sustainable optimization strategies. Bioresource Technology Reports. 26: 101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2024.101850
  4. Arias, D. P. (2020). La implementación del acuerdo de paz y la transformación del conflicto armado en Colombia. Revista Científica General José María Córdova. 18(31): 565-584. ttps://doi.org/10.21830/issn.1900-6586
  5. Atkinson, R.; Berru, S.; Delgado, L.; Yovera, F.; Berru, J.; Robledo, Y.; Cruz, G. (2023). Identifying the origin of acrylamide in Peruvian panela production to inform strategies for its reduction. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A. 40(4): 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2023.2187646
  6. Cano Sapuy, A. L.; Carvajal Calderón, N; Lasso Bolaños, O. (2023). Estrategias didácticas, blog educativo y desarrollo de habilidades lectoras en estudiantes del grado cuarto, municipio de Isnos Huila. https://repositorio.unicartagena.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/f2832c25-bb25-4cb8-84aa-d2a5a6ec69b2/content
  7. Collantes-Gonzáles, R. D.;Atencio-Valdespino, R. (2023). Producción artesanal de panela en Tinajas, Dolega—Ciriquí: Estudio de caso. Revista Investigación Agraria. 5(3): 6-13. https://doi.org/10.47840/ReInA.5.3.1937
  8. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística-DANE. (2021). Cuentas nacionales departamentales. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/cultura/economia-cultural-y-creativa/reportes
  9. Dray, S; Dufour, A.B. (2007). The ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software. 22: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v022.i04
  10. FINAGRO. (2023). Informe de gestión sostenible 2023. https://www.finagro.com.co/sites/default/files/basic-page/2024-03/Finagro-IGS-2023_0.pdf
  11. Flora, C.B.; Flora, J.L.; Gasteyer, S.P. (2018). Rural Communities: Legacy + Change Rural Communities: Legacy + Change; Taylor and Francis: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, pp. 1–488. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780429494697/rural-communities-cornelia-butler-flora-jan-flora-stephen-gasteyer
  12. Flórez-Martínez, D. H; Contreras-Pedraza, C; Rodríguez, J. (2021). A systematic analysis of non-centrifugal sugar cane processing: Research and new trends. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 107: 415-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.11.011
  13. García, R; Rosas, G; Sanchez, V. (2023). Socio-financial functioning of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.) processing for the production of panela: the case of the Bellavista village. FACE: Revista De La Facultad De Ciencias Económicas Y Empresariales. 23(1): 211-225. https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v23i1.2476
  14. Hernández-Nunez, H; Suárez, J; Andrade, H; Acosta, J; Núñez, R; Gutiérrez, D; Gutiérrez, G; Gutiérrez, I; Casanoves, F. (2024). Interactions between climate, shade canopy characteristics and cocoa production in Colombia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8: 1295992. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1295992
  15. Husson, F; Josse, J; Lee, S; Mazet, J. (2025). FactoMineR: Multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.FactoMineR
  16. Imbach, C.A. (2016). Analizando las Conexiones Entre la Satisfacción de las Necesidades Fundamentales y los Recursos de las Comunidades Rurales, 1st ed.; Geolatina Ediciones: Turrialba, Costa Rica.
  17. Jiménez-Carvajal, D.A.; Sánchez-Avilés, A.M.; Hernández-Núñez, H.E.; Gutiérrez-García, G. A.; Rojas-Vargas, S; Hembuz-Falla, G. D.; Salamanca-Falla, C. S.; Ortiz-Morea, F. A. (2024). Role of sugarcane cultivation for panela production in the livelihood strategies of peasant families in the Colombian Amazon. Human Ecology. 52: 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-024-00494-5
  18. Kassambara, A. (2020). Mundt, F. Package ‘factoextra’. Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra (accessed on 27 April 2025).
  19. Kovtun, O. V. (2020). Pluriatividade e agroindústrias rurais no Maranhão: Uma análise baseada no censo agropecuário de 2006. Revista Pós Ciências Sociais. 16(32): 189-217. https://doi.org/10.18764/2236-9473.v16n32p189-217
  20. Martínez-Moyano, E.; Agudelo Ardila, D.; Capera Montalvo, E. A.; Loaiza Molina, L. C.; Cuéllar Ramírez, M.; Rojas Peña, O. R. (2023). Medios de vida rurales de familias porcicultoras del municipio de La Montañita, Caquetá, Colombia. CES Medicina Veterinaria Y Zootecnia. 17(3): 10–24. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesmvz.6952
  21. Martínez-Moyano, E; Hernández-Aya, D; Hernández-Guerrero, K; Arias-Betancourth, J; Zapata-Ortíz, C; Rojas-Peña, O. (2024). Evaluación de los medios de vida sostenibles y la aplicación de los capitales de la comunidad: Estudio de caso de familias ganaderas de El Doncello, Caquetá-Colombia. Investigación & Desarrollo. 32(2): 20-34. https://doi.org/10.14482/indes.32.02.986.765
  22. Muñoz, J; Carranza, B; Cortés, Y; Rodríguez, L. (2024). Comprehensive characterization of high Andean sugarcane production systems (Saccharum officinarum) for panela production in Colombia. Revista Ceres. 71: e71036. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X2024710036
  23. Prayitno, G; Auliah, A; Efendi, A; Hayat, A; Subagiyo, A; Salsabila, A. (2025). The role of livelihood assets in affecting community adaptive capacity in facing shocks in Karangrejo Village, Indonesia. Economies. 13(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13010013
  24. R Core Team. (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Available: http://www.r-project.org/
  25. Rodríguez-Borray, G. A.; Cruz-Castiblanco, G. N.; Tauta-Muñoz, J; Huertas-Carranza, B.; Polo-Murcia, S. M. (2022). Rural agro-industrial enterprises diversity: Typologies of panela production in Huila, Colombia. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 33(2): 47969. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v33i2.47969
  26. Rojas-Granada, C.; Cuesta-Borja, R. (2021). Los estudios sobre el conflicto armado y la construcción de paz en Colombia desde una perspectiva territorial: Abordajes y desafíos. Revista CS. 33: 205-235. https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i33.3995
  27. Rojas-Peña, O; Martínez-Moyano, E. (2022). Main agricultural production projects implemented by ex-combatants from “Héctor Ramírez” rural settlement located in La Montañita, Colombia. Revista FAGROPEC. 14(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.47847/fagropec.v14n1a4
  28. Rojas-Peña, O. R.; Martínez-Moyano, E.; Pérez-Medina, M. J.; Espinosa-Calderón, L. M (2024). Construcción de un índice de calidad de vida en el marco de los capitales de la comunidad de excombatientes de las FARC: un estudio de caso. Revista FAGROPEC. 16(1): 15-35. https://doi.org/10.47847/fagropec.v16n1a2
  29. Solís, L; Lanari, M.; Oyarzabal, M. (2020). Tipificación integral de sistemas caprinos de la provincia de Santa Elena, Ecuador. La Granja. 31(1): 82-95. https://doi.org/10.17163/lgr.n31.2020.06
  30. Sópalo-Romero, J.I.; Quezada-Torres, D. C.; Valarezo-Quinaluisa, R. A.; Quezada-Torres, W.; Proaño-Molina, M.; Recalde-Luna, S.; Tapia-Zúñiga, M.; Quezada-Moreno, W. (2024). Socioeconomic evaluation in the intensification of a panela agroindustry. Afinidad. Journal of Chemical Engineering Theoretical and Applied Chemistry. 81(603): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.55815/431819
  31. Suárez, A. E.; Gutiérrez-Montes, I.; Ortiz-Morea, F. A.; Ordoñez, C.; Suárez, J. C.; Casanoves, F. (2021). Dimensions of social and political capital in interventions to improve household well-being: Implications for coffee-growing areas in southern Colombia. PLOS ONE. 16(1): e0245971. ttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245971
  32. Suárez, A. E.; Gutiérrez-Montes, I.; Ortiz-Morea, F. A.; Suárez, J.; Di Rienzo, J.; Casanoves, F. (2022). Contribution of Livelihoods to the Well-Being of Coffee-Growing Households in Southern Colombia: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainability. 14(2): 743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020743
  33. Suriyankietkaew, S; Krittayaruangroj, K; Thinthan, S; Lumlongrut, S. (2025). Community capitals framework for sustainable development: A qualitative study of creative Tourism in Ban Chiang World Heritage Site. Sustainability. 17(8): 3311. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083311
  34. Tengapoe, K.; Baddianaah, I.; Yaradua, A. S. (2024). Access to social capital and smallholder agricultural practices: The case of smallholder farmers in North-Western Ghana. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 10(1): 2353670. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2353670

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.