Institutional systems of student evaluation between theory and practical reality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.141501.59Keywords:
Institutional system of students evaluation, perceptions, attitudes, practicesAbstract
The article is part of the research entitled “Institutional Systems of student evaluation (SIEE) in the Educational Institutions of the Andean Department of Nariño 2011-2012, “ approved by the system of research of the University of Nariño by means of agreement No. 034 of 28 March, developed by the Research Group for the Development of Education and Pedagogy (GIDEP) .
This article presents the results of the above mentioned research project which proposes: to establish concepts, agreements and institutional practices in order to identify perceptions and attitudes that teachers, parents, and students have regarding the SIEE, and to derive some related theoretical - practical information in order to formulate a plan for the improvement of evaluation processes.
The research was developed with a qualitative research approach of evaluative nature, under the research - action methodology, which was deployed in five stages. The outcomes found that teachers and educational institutions interpreted the new rules of evaluation (Decree 1290 2009 MEN) as a mechanism for improving academic performance, with a return to a quantitative evaluation of results, which would mean a decline of 50 years in the history of evaluation in Colombia.
Consequently, the standard issued by the Ministry of National Education (MEN) has involved neither a conceptual, attitudinal, nor procedural change in its evaluative practices of teachers, which forces the thought that these must be accompanied by concrete actions in order to advance achievements that seek improvements to evaluation processes.
Downloads
References
(1) ÁLVAREZ MÉNDEZ, J. M. (2001). Evaluar para conocer, examinar para excluir. Madrid: Morata.
(2) CANO, M.E. (2008). La evaluación por competencias en la educación superior. En: Revista Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y formación del profesorado. Barcelona.
(3) DELGADO, A. M. (2006). Evaluación de las competencias en el espacio europeo de educación superior. Barcelona: Boch Ediciones
(4) DELORS, J. (1998). Informe a la Unesco de la comisión internacional sobre la educación para el siglo XXI: La educación encierra un tesoro. Madrid.
(5) FROLA, P. (2007). Maestros competentes a través de la planeación y la evaluación por competencias. Trillas, México.
(6) GARCÍA, J. (2003). Didáctica de las ciencias. Resolución de problemas y desarrollo de la creatividad. Bogotá: Magisterio.
(7) MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN NACIONAL (2009). Decreto 1290 de 2009. República de Colombia.
(8) MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN NACIONAL (2009). Fundamentos y orientaciones para la fundamentación en la implementación del Decreto 1290 de 2009. República de Colombia.
(9) GUERRA, M. Á. S. (2003). Una echa en la diana: la evaluación como aprendizaje (Vol. 166). España: Narcea Ediciones.
(10) STUFFLEBEAM, D. (2002). Evaluación Sistémica: Guía teórica y práctica. España: Ed. Paidós Ibérica, S.A.
(11) TOBÓN, S. (2005). Formación basada en competencias: pensamiento complejo, diseño curricular y didáctica. Bogotá: Ecoe Ediciones.
(12) TORRES, M. A. y Otros (2002). Las prácticas evaluativas de los maestros de la E.N.S. de Nariño y Putumayo. U DE N. Pasto.
(13) TORRES, M. A. (2006). Análisis histórico lógico de la evaluación en Colombia período 1967-2006. Ponencia Congreso Internacional de Educación. Rudecolombia. Paipa, Boyacá.
(14) TORRES, M. A. (2009). Evaluación Democrática. En: Maestro Legal, Pasto.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional License. The articles can be copied, distributed, adapted and communicated publicly, as long as the credits of the work are recognized and the respective source is quoted. This work can not be used for commercial purposes.
To increase their visibility, documents are sent to databases and indexing systems.
The content of the items is the responsibility of each author, and does not compromise in any way, journal or institution.