Decision making of consumers and conservatism in Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.202102.158Keywords:
business, conservatism, ideology, products, decision makingAbstract
This study seeks to know how political conservatism can influence the number of criteria used for consumers for decision making. Intentional sampling is carried out using an electronic online tool in Costa Rica in May 2020. The results suggest the level of political conservatism influences the decision making of consumers.
Downloads
References
(1) Albarracin, D., & Shavitt, S. (2018). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 299-327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911
(2) Baker, H., Filbeck, G., & Ricciardi, V. (2017). Financial Behavior. Players, services, products and markets. OXFORD University Press.
(3) Becker, A., Deckers, T., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., & Kosse, F. (2012). The relationship between economic preference and psychological personality measures. The Annual Review of Economics, 4, 453-478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110922
(4) Brussino, S., Rabbia, H., Imhoff, D. y Paz, A. (2011). Dimensión operativa de la ideología política en ciudadanos de Córdoba. Psicología Política, 1(43), 85-106. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3861808
(5) Carmines, E., & D'Amico, N. (2015). The new look in political ideology research. Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060314-115422
(6) Copur, Z. (2015). Handbook of research on behavioral finance and investment strategies: Decision Making in the financial industry. IGI Global.
(7) Dionne, S., Gooty, J., Yammamiro, F., & Sayama, H. (2018). Decision making in crisis: A multilevel model of the interplay between cognitions and emotions. Organizational Psychology Review, 8(2-3), 95-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386618756063
(8) Freeden, M., Sargent, L., & Stears, M. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press.
(9) Hirshleifer, D. (2015). Behavioral Finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7, 133-159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-092214-043752
(10) Jost, J., Federico, C., & Napier, J. (2009). Political Ideology: Its structure, functions and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307-37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
(11) Lerner, J., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799-823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
(12) Oppenheimer, D., & Kelso, E. (2015). Information processing as a paradigm for Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015148
(13) Sánchez-Campos, P. (2017). Construcción de una escala de ideología política en el contexto costarricense a partir de un trabajo realizado en Córdoba, Argentina. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 7(2), 2747-2754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aipprr.2017.06.005
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional License. The articles can be copied, distributed, adapted and communicated publicly, as long as the credits of the work are recognized and the respective source is quoted. This work can not be used for commercial purposes.
To increase their visibility, documents are sent to databases and indexing systems.
The content of the items is the responsibility of each author, and does not compromise in any way, journal or institution.
