A influência do pensamento administrativo na gestão do conhecimento e inovação: revisão sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.252602.283Palavras-chave:
aprendizagem ativa, cultura do trabalho, tecnologia da informação, tomada de decisões, transferência de conhecimentos, pensamento críticoResumo
Introducción: Este estudio examina cómo los enfoques del pensamiento administrativo pueden integrarse en la gestión del conocimiento, con el fin de promover la innovación y mejorar la eficiencia operativa en organizaciones contemporáneas. Objetivo: Analizar estrategias administrativas que optimicen el aprovechamiento del conocimiento organizacional y destaquen su impacto en la innovación y el rendimiento empresarial. Metodología: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de literatura mediante el método PRISMA, recopilando estudios publicados entre 2019 y 2023 en las bases de datos ScienceDirect, SpringerLink y Emerald Insight. Se seleccionaron 27 artículos que exploran la relación entre pensamiento administrativo, la gestión del conocimiento, la innovación y la eficiencia operativa. Resultados: Los hallazgos muestran que estrategias colaborativas, como comunidades de práctica y aprendizaje, facilitan la creación y transferencia de conocimiento; mientras que herramientas tecnológicas, como los sistemas de gestión del conocimiento y el análisis de datos, optimizan la toma de decisiones y mejoran la eficiencia operativa. Conclusiones: La integración de enfoques administrativos con tecnologías avanzadas permite a las organizaciones incrementar su adaptabilidad, fomentar la innovación continua y alcanzar una mayor eficiencia operativa. Esto resalta la necesidad de promover una cultura colaborativa e invertir en tecnologías que potencien el flujo del conocimiento organizacional, con el fin de garantizar un desempeño sostenible y competitivo.
Downloads
Referências
(1) Acuña, N. & Sánchez, M. (2023). Integrating systems thinking and flexibility in infrastructure management. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 8(144). https://doi.org/nkhf
(2) Ali, M. A., Hussin, N., Haddad, H., Alkhodary, D. & Marei, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and their impact on intellectual capital and innovation performance. Sustainability, 13(18), 10028. https://doi.org/gv58g6
(3) Amushila, J. & Bussin, M. (2021). The effect of talent management practices on employee retention at the Namibia University of Science and Technology: middle-level administration staff. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(485). https://doi.org/nkhg
(4) Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
(5) Awais, M., Ali, A., Khattak, M. S., Arfeen, M. I., Chaudhary, M. A. & Syed, A. (2023). Strategic flexibility and organizational performance: mediating role of innovation. Sage Open, 13(2). https://doi.org/nkhh
(6) Betancur, J. H., Rodríguez, G. D., Rave, E. D. y Moncada, E. A. (2022). Gestión del conocimiento en 10 empresas colombianas siguiendo el modelo Nonaka y Takeuchi: Estudio de casos múltiples entrelazados. Cuadernos de Administración (Universidad del Valle), 38(74), e2311740. https://doi.org/nkhd
(7) Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/d8cwcn
(8) Camarinha, L. M., Fornasiero, R., Ramezani, J. & Ferrada, F. (2019). Collaborative networks: a pillar of digital transformation. Applied Sciences, 9(24), 5431. https://doi.org/ghj75b
(9) Chen, X., Xie, H. & Zhou, H. (2024). Incremental versus radical innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: a moderated mediation model. Sustainability, 16(11), 4545. https://doi.org/nkhj
(10) Dairo, M., Adekola, J., Apostolopoulos, C. & Tsaramirsis, G. (2021). Benchmarking strategic alignment of business and IT strategies: opportunities, risks, challenges and solutions. International Journal of Information Technology, 13, 2191–2197. https://doi.org/nkhk
(11) Davenport, T. (2014). Big data @ work. dispelling the myths, uncovering the opportunities. Harvard Business Review Press. https://tinyurl.com/4aj7cham
(12) Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press. https://tinyurl.com/ybbsn3cy
(13) Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg. (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1 - 19). Elsevier. https://telearn.hal.science/hal-00190240v1
(14) Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist society. HarperBusiness. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080938257
(15) Edmondson, A. (2019). The fearless organization: creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons. https://tinyurl.com/bdemd7fd
(16) El Massi, K. & Hamri, H. M. (2023). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 4(6-1), 437 - 450. https://tinyurl.com/5hb4unxt
(17) Farnese, M. L., Barbieri, B., Chirumbolo, A. & Patriotta, G. (2019). Managing knowledge in organizations: a Nonaka’s SECI model operationalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2730. https://doi.org/ghs879
(18) Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L. & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: the roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47-59. https://doi.org/gqhw4c
(19) Feil, A. A., Schreiber, D., Haetinger, C., Strasburg, V. J. & Barkert, C. L. (2019). Sustainability indicators for industrial organizations: systematic review of literature. Sustainability, 11(3), 854. https://doi.org/gnchnk
(20) Gandrita, D. M. (2023). Improving strategic planning: the crucial role of enhancing relationships between management levels. Administrative Science, 13(10), 211. https://doi.org/nkhm
(21) Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78-91. https://tinyurl.com/3znbfy7z
(22) Gede, D. U. & Huluka, A. T. (2023). The impact of strategic alignment on organizational performance: the case of Ethiopian universities. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2247873. https://doi.org/nkhn
(23) Hammer, M. y Champy, J. (1994). Reingeniería. olvide lo que usted sabe sobre cómo debe funcionar una empresa. ¡casi todo está errado! Norma. https://tinyurl.com/4f5wt8us
(24) Hansen, J. Ø., Jensen, A. & Nguyen, N. (2020). The responsible learning organization: can Senge (1990) teach organizations how to become responsible innovators? The Learning Organization, 27(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/gjqq24
(25) Hetemi, E., Pushkina, O. & Zerjav, V. (2022). Collaborative practices of knowledge work in IT projects. International Journal of Project Management, 40(8), 906-920. https://doi.org/gq623n
(26) Husain, Z., Dayan, B. & Chaudhry, I. S. (2024). Roles of organizational flexibility and organizational support on service innovation via organizational learning – a moderated mediation model. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 100367. https://doi.org/nkhp
(27) Imran, M. Y., Elahi, N. S., Abid, G., Ashfaq, F. & Ilyas, S. (2020). Impact of perceived organizational support on work engagement: mediating mechanism of thriving and flourishing. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030082
(28) Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: theory and research (2.a ed.). Interaction Book Company. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/10033071
(29) Kagan, S. & Kagan, M. (1994). Cooperative learning (2.a ed.). Kagan Publishing.
(30) Kucharska, W. & Erickson, G. S. (2023). Tacit knowledge acquisition & sharing, and its influence on innovations: A polish/US cross-country study. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102647. https://doi.org/nkhr
(31) Li, Y.M. & Jhang. Li, J.H. (2010). Knowledge sharing in communities of practice: a game theoretic analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 1052-1064. https://doi.org/dmsk77
(32) Linnéusson, G., Andersson, T., Kjellsdotter, A. & Holmén, M. (2022). Using systems thinking to increase understanding of the innovation system of healthcare organisations. Journal of health organization and management, 36(9), 179–195. https://doi.org/gqf944
(33) López, P., Cruz, J., Navas, J. E. & Perona, M. M. (2021). Organizational integration mechanisms and knowledge transfer effectiveness in MNCs: the moderating role of cross-national distance. Journal of International Management, 27(4), 100872. https://doi.org/nkhs
(34) Mancuso, I., Messeni, A. & Panniello, U. (2024). Value creation in data-centric B2B platforms: A model based on multiple case studies. Industrial Marketing Management, 119, 1-14. https://doi.org/nkht
(35) McNab, D., McKay, J., Shorrock, S., Luty, S. & Bowie, P. (2023). Development and application of ‘systems thinking’ principles for quality improvement. BMJ Open Quality, 12(1), e000714. https://doi.org/gdq4
(36) Medne, A. & Lapina, I. (2019). Sustainability and continuous improvement of organization: review of process-oriented performance indicators. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030049
(37) Mikalef, P., van de Wetering, R. & Krogstie, J. (2021). Building dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics: The role of organizational inertia. Information & Management, 58(6), 103412. https://doi.org/gj3bsw
(38) Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the research. Prentice-Hall. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/10027624
(39) Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/bq3jpc
(40) Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press. https://tinyurl.com/55uxmdsr
(41) Obeidat, A. M. (2019). IT adaption with knowledge conversion process (SECI). Management Science Letters, 9(9), 2241–2252. https://tinyurl.com/jj4pwnjj
(42) Ohno, T. (1998). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Productivity Press. https://tinyurl.com/44tpzsuy
(43) Pisoni, G., Molnár, B. & Tarcsi, Á. (2023). Knowledge management and data analysis techniques for data-driven financial companies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 13374 – 13393. https://doi.org/nkhv
(44) Polanyi, M. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. The University Chicago Press. https://tinyurl.com/4vmhn68s
(45) Reinking, J., Arnold, V. & Sutton, S. G. (2020). Synthesizing enterprise data through digital dashboards to strategically align performance: why do operational managers use dashboards? International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 37, 100452. https://doi.org/nkhw
(46) Ringberg, T., Reihlen, M. & Rydén, P. (2019). The technology-mindset interactions: Leading to incremental, radical or revolutionary innovations. Industrial Marketing Management, 79, 102–113. https://doi.org/gfgvkp
(47) Rossignoli, F., Lionzo, A., Henschel, T. & Boers, B. (2024). Knowledge sharing in family SMEs: the role of communities of practice. Journal of Family Business Management, 14(2), 310-331. https://doi.org/gsmg38
(48) Rowe, L., Knight, L., Irvine, P. & Greenwood, J. (2023). Communities of practice for contemporary leadership development and knowledge exchange through work-based learning. Journal of Education and Work, 36(6), 494–510. https://doi.org/nkhc
(49) Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4.a ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://tinyurl.com/3vafs57k
(50) Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday. https://tinyurl.com/mwy5s3w2
(51) Tobin, R., Crawford, G., Hallett, J., Maycock, B. & Lobo, R. (2022). Utilizing causal loop diagramming to explore a research and evaluation capacity building partnership. Frontiers in public health, 10, 857918. https://doi.org/nkhx
(52) Venkatraman, S. & Venkatraman, R. (2018). Communities of practice approach for knowledge management systems. Systems, 6(4), 36. https://doi.org/gpjt9d
(53) Wendra, W., Sule, E. T., Joeliaty, J. & Azis, Y. (2019). Exploring dynamic capabilities, intellectual capital and innovation performance relationship: evidence from the garment manufacturing. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 123-136. https://doi.org/nkhb
(54) Wenger, E. C. & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139-145. https://tinyurl.com/2vbem28t
(55) Wiig, K. M. (1993). Knowledge management foundations: thinking about thinking – how people and organizations create, represent, and use knowledge. Schema Press. https://tinyurl.com/3dkrnzkf
(56) Xuecheng, W., Iqbal, Q. & Bai, S. (2022). Factors affecting employee’s retention: integration of situational leadership with social exchange theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 872105. https://doi.org/nkhz
(57) Yang, H. & Zhou, D. (2022). Perceived organizational support and creativity of science-technology talents in the digital age: the effects of affective commitment, innovative self-efficacy and digital thinking. Psychology research and behavior management, 15, 2421–2437. https://doi.org/nkh2
(58) Yoshikuni, A. C., Dwivedi, R., Zhou, D. & Wamba, S. F. (2023). Big data and business analytics enabled innovation and dynamic capabilities in organizations: Developing and validating scale. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100206. https://doi.org/nkh3
(59) Zamiri, M. & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Methods and technologies for supporting knowledge sharing within learning communities: a systematic literature review. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/nkh4
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
Esta revista está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional License. Los artículos se pueden copiar, distribuir, adaptar y comunicar públicamente, siempre y cuando se reconozcan los créditos de la obra y se cite la respectiva fuente. Esta obra no puede ser utilizada con fines comerciales.
Para aumentar su visibilidad, los documentos se envían a bases de datos y sistemas de indización.
El contenido de los artículos es responsabilidad de cada autor y no compromete, de ninguna manera, a la revista o a la institución.
