Study of terrestrial isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda: Oniscidea) in three localities of Boyaca, Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.143102.28Keywords:
Crustacean, Oniscidea, Boyacá, composition, abundance.Abstract
The composition and abundance of terrestrial isopods were analyzed by direct collection at three localities in the department of Boyacá, Colombia: Tinjacá, Tibasosa, and Tota. Five species distributed in two families were identified from a total of 2516 field collected individuals, for which new occurrence reports in Boyacá are presented for:Porcellio dilatatus (Brandt), Porcellionides pruinosus (Brandt), Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) and Armadillidium nasatum (Budde-Lund). Statistically significant differences were found regarding the number of individuals, locality, and species present. The greatest abundance and richness were found in the municipality of Tibasosa. The isopods sampled were mainly found in the so-called ‘plateo’ microhabitat, or the surrounding soil of the vegetation. The most abundant species was P. scaber and the most common one was A. vulgare. The environmental conditions were not related to the number of individuals collected.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ARAUJO, P.; BUCKUP, L.; BOND-BUCKUP, G.1996. Isópodos terrestres (Crustácea, Oniscidea) de Santa Catarina e Rio Grande do Sul. Serie Zoologia. 81(75):111 - 138.
GARCÍA, F.; CAMPOS. J. 2001. Biologia e controle de artrópodes de importância fitossanitária (Diplopoda, Symphyla, Isopoda), pouco conhecidos no Brasil. Revisto Biológico. 63(1/2):7 -13.
GONZÁLEZ, G. 2004. Bichos bolita. Peligrosidad y condiciones predisponentes. En: http://www.rizobacter.com/home/es/.3p; consulta: julio, 2013.
GREGORY, S. 2009. Woodlice and Waterlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea & Asellota) in Britain and Ireland. First edition. Field Studies Council/ Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. UK. 176 p.
HASSALL, M.; DAVIS, R.; PROCTER, D. 1992. Lateral movements of isopods in a dune grassland, Proceedings of the European Congress of Entomology, First edition. Edit Jenser G. Amsterdam. 192 p.
HASSALL, M. 1996. Spatial variation in favourability of a grass heath as a habitat for woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea). Pedobiologia. 40:514 - 528.
HASSALL, M.; TUCK, M.; JAMES, R. 2005. Effects of density and spatial heterogeneity on foraging behaviour and fitness correlates of Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Oniscidea). Ethology Ecology and Evolution. 17:233 - 247.
HOPKIN, S. P. 1991. A Key to the woodlice of Britain and Ireland. Field Studies. 7:599 - 650.
HORNUNG, E.; TÓTHMÉRÉSZ, B.; MAGURA, T.; VILISICS, F. 2007. Changes of isopod assemblages along an urban-suburban-rural gradient in Hungary. European Journal Soil Biology. 43:158 - 165.
HOUSTON, W.W.K.; BEESLEY, P. L. 2002. Zoological catalogue of Australia. Ed. 19.2ª. CSIRO publishing. Sydney. 433 p.
HUNTER, M.; ADL, S.; PRINGLE, C.; COLEMAN, D. 2003. Relative effects of macroinvertebrates and habitat on the chemistry of litter during decomposition. Pedobiologia. 47:2 - 6.
LEISTIKOW, A.; WOLFGANG, W. J. 1999. Checklist of the terrestrial isopods of the new world (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 16(1):1 - 72.
LEISTIKOW, A. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of South American Crinocheta traditionally placed in the family “Philosciidae” (Crustácea: Isópoda: Oniscidea). Organism Diversity & Evolution. 4:1 - 85.
LEISTIKOW, A.; ARAUJO, P.B. 2006. The systematic position of Benthanoscia longicaudata Lemos de Castro, 1958 (Isopoda: Oniscidea: Crinocheta). Systematics and Biodiversity. 4(3):243 - 254.
LOPES, E.R.C.; SOUZA, M.; BOND-BUCKUP, G.; ARAUJO, P. B. 2005. Oniscidea diversity across three environments in a altitudinal gradients in northeastern Rio grande do sul, Brazil. European Journal of Soil Biology. 41:99 - 107.
MYERS, P.; R. ESPINOSA; C. S. PARR; T. JONES; G. S. HAMMOND; T. A. DEWEY. 2015. The Animal Diversity Web (online). En: http://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Armadillidium_nasatum/classification/,%201%20p.
PAOLETTI, M.; HASSALL, M. 1999. Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea): their potential for assessing sustainability and use as bioindicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 74:157 – 165.
QUADROS, A.F.; ARAUJO. P.B. 2007. Ecological traits of two neotropical oniscideans (Crustacea: Isopoda). Acta Zoologica Sinica. 53(2):241 - 249.
RODRÍGUEZ, A. G.; ORTEGA, V. V.; TREVIÑO, F. 2014. Macrocrustáceos del Parque Nacional Cumbres de Monterrey, México: distribución y estado de conservación. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 85(1):276 - 293.
RUSHTON, P.; HASSALL, M. 1983. Food and feeding rates of the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille), Oecologia, 57:257 - 261.
SALUSO, A. 2001. Isópodos terrestres asociados al cultivo de soja en siembra directa. INTA EEA Paraná. Argentina. En: www.inta.gov.ar/parana/info/documentos/produccion_vegetal/soja/evaluacion_manejo/Soja_Isopodos.pdf; consulta: junio, 2013.
SOUTY-GROSSET, C.; BADENHAUSSER, I.;REYNOLDS, J. D.; MOREL, A. 2005. Investigations on the potential of woodlice as bioindicators of grassland habitat quality. European Journal Soil Biology. 41:109 - 116.
VANDEL, A. 1960. Isópodos terrestres (Premiére partie). Faune de France. 64:1 - 416.
VITERI, S.; MÉNDEZ, M.; RESTREPO, D.; GAONA, R. 2005. Investigación participativa hacia un manejo ecológico de la cebolla de bulbo en Cucaita y Tibasosa
