Social philosophy: History, current status, and future potential

Authors

  • Harold Edmundo Mora Campo, Mag. Universidad del Valle

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22267/rceilat.204647.92

Keywords:

Social philosophy, Recognition theory, Social pathologies, Emancipation, democracy

Abstract

Social philosophy has a future independent of normative philosophy, which could eventually lead to the pretense of a weak and formal anthropology. Based
on recognition theory and given that current social philosophy has a historical basis, together with the stated anthropological dimension it will ensure its survival in the future. This article is divided into three parts: I) History of social philosophy; over the last two hundred years, philosophy has undergone a process of differentiation that has resulted in the creation of several sub-disciplines. For this reason, although the classical tripartition (theoretical philosophy, practical philosophy and aesthetic philosophy) subsists, in practice, other divisions have arisen that hardly fit the aforementioned scheme; II) an analysis of social pathologies, which implies that it should no longer be the State, but Society that slowly separates from it. This is how social philosophy emerges, as an ethical perspective, used to study social pathologies, which provoke social struggles that seek recognition and emancipation; III) potentialities of said discipline for the future. What should be assumed as “normal” about a social way of life that enables emancipation would be validated to the extent that the members of society itself come to a consensus on the desire to assume social development through democratic organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Harold Edmundo Mora Campo, Mag., Universidad del Valle

Profesor de Tiempo Completo adscrito al programa de Derecho de la UCEVA, catedrático de la Universidad del Valle sede Buga y Tuluá, Abogado de la Universidad Santiago de Cali, Candidato a Doctor en Filosofía de la Universidad del Valle, Magíster en Educación de la Universidad San Buenaventura sede Cali, Magíster en Filosofía del Derecho Contemporáneo de la Universidad Autónoma de Occidente de Cali, en convenio con la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Especialista en Derecho Procesal de la Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana de Medellín, en convenio con la Universidad San Buenaventura Cali.

References

De Bono, E. (1986). El pensamiento lateral. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Vergara – Granica.

Grueso, D. (2008). Tres modos de involucrar el reconocimiento en la justicia. Cali, Colombia: Universidad del Valle.

Grueso, D. (2015). La recuperación de Hegel por parte de Axel Honneth. En Reconocimiento y democracia desafíos de la justicia (p.p. 21-39). Cali, Colombia: Universidad del Valle.

Grueso, D. (2018). Apuntes de clase. Cali, Colombia: Universidad del Valle.

Honneth, A. (2011). La sociedad del desprecio. Madrid, España: Trota.

Londoño, C. (20015). Habermas entre la Teoría Crítica y el Liberalismo. En Reconocimiento y democracia desafíos de la justicia (p.p. 101-131). Cali, Colombia: Universidad del Valle.

Mèlich, J. C. (2001). La ausencia del testimonio. Barcelona, España: Anthropos Editorial Rubi.

Miguez, E. (2012). Antropología e historia. Memoria americana, (20-1). Recuperadode: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1851-37512012000100009

Platón. (1966). Obras completas. (M. Araujo et al. Trads.). Madrid, España: Aguilar.

Rousseau, J. (2005). Discurso sobre la desigualdad. Madrid, España: Editorial Tecnos.

Published

2020-12-21

How to Cite

Mora Campo, H. E. (2020). Social philosophy: History, current status, and future potential. ESTUDIOS LATINOAMERICANOS, (46-47), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.22267/rceilat.204647.92

 Otras métricas: