Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2021): Vol. XXII No. 2 Second Semester July - December 2021

Virtual team leadership: bibliometric study

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.212202.180
Submitted
June 29, 2021
Published
2021-07-01

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present a bibliometric review of the topics related to leadership in virtual teams, showing its trends, evolution in scientific production, the journals with the greatest impact, and the most distinctive authors. Likewise, a study of agglomeration and concordance in the VOSviewer software was used; as a result, 192 research documents were found in a period from 1998 to 2020 through a search equation formulated in the Scopus database; showing a growing interest in relation to leadership in virtual teams. Finally, as the main finding, five bibliographic clusters (CB) were found that could establish new lines of documentary and field research on leadership in digital environments.

References

  1. (1) Alexander, P. M. (2006). Virtual teamwork in very large undergraduate classes. Computers & Education, 47(2), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.09.004
  2. (2) Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003
  3. (3) Black, L. W., Welser, H. T., Cosley, D., & DeGroot, J. M. (2011). Self-governance through group discussion in Wikipedia: Measuring deliberation in online groups. Small Group Research, 42(5), 595-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411406137
  4. (4) Bracho, O. y García, J. (2013). Algunas consideraciones teóricas sobre liderazgo transformacional. TELOS, 15(2), 165-177.
  5. (5) Cascio, W., & Shurygailo, S. (2008). E-leadership and virtual teams. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36(1), 79-79. 10.1109/EMR.2008.4490142
  6. (6) Cascio, W., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
  7. (7) Castro-López, A., Puente, J. y Vázquez-Casielles, R. (2020). ¿Es leal el cliente de moda online? Claves de éxito para maximizar su lealtad en plataformas de venta online. Direccion y Organizacion, (70), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.37610/DYO.V0I70.569
  8. (8) Cerón, M. (2015). Valoración del ambiente virtual de aprendizaje de la Universidad de Nariño Virtual. Tendencias, 16(1), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.151601.31
  9. (9) Cordery, J. L., & Soo, C. (2008). Overcoming impediments to virtual team effectiveness. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 18(5), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20119
  10. (10) De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press.
  11. (11) DeRosa, D. M., Hantula, D. A., Kock, N., & D'Arcy, J. (2004). Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management, 43(2‐3), 219-232.
  12. (12) Durkheim, E. (1985). Las reglas del método sociológico (Vol. 86). Ediciones Akal.
  13. (13) Dustdar, S. (2004). Caramba—a process-aware collaboration system supporting ad hoc and collaborative processes in virtual teams. Distributed and parallel databases, 15(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DAPD.0000009431.20250.56
  14. (14) Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2006). Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 37(5), 459-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406292337
  15. (15) Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: On team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.451
  16. (16) González-Marcos, A., Alba-Elías, F., Navaridas-Nalda, F., & Ordieres-Meré, J. (2016). Student evaluation of a virtual experience for project management learning: An empirical study for learning improvement. Computers & Education, 102(1), 172-187.
  17. (17) Großer, B., & Baumöl, U. (2017). Why virtual teams work–State of the art. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 297-305.
  18. (18) Gubert, X. A. (2019). La industria 4.0, el nuevo motor de la innovación industrial. Dirección y Organización, 69, 99–110.
  19. (19) Gurvitch, G. (1941). Las formas de la sociabilidad, ensayos de sociología. Editoral Losada, SA.
  20. (20) Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. (2007a). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 103(1), 1-20.
  21. (21) Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. (2007b). Virtual team leadership: Perspectives from the field. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 3(1), 40-64.
  22. (22) Harvey, M., Novicevic, M. M., & Garrison, G. (2004). Challenges to staffing global virtual teams. Human Resource Management Review, 14(3), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.06.005
  23. (23) Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Voss, K. (2006). Competencies for virtual teamwork: Developmentand validation of a web-based selection tool for members of distributed teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(4), 477-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320600908187
  24. (24) Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12108
  25. (25) Holtbrügge, D., Schillo, K., Rogers, H., & Friedmann, C. (2011). Managing and training for virtual teams in India. Team Performance Management, 17(3-4), 206-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591111143727
  26. (26) Hunsaker, P. L., & Hunsaker, J. S. (2008). Virtual teams: a leader's guide. Team Performance Management, 14(1-2), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810860221
  27. (27) Krumm, S., Kanthak, J., Hartmann, K., & Hertel, G. (2016). What does it take to be a virtual team player? The knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics required in virtual teams. Human Performance, 29(2), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1154061
  28. (28) Lee, M. R. (2009). E-ethical leadership for virtual project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 27(5), 456-463.
  29. (29) Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 648-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010
  30. (30) Miguel, S. (2011). Revistas y producción científica de América Latina y el Caribe: su visibilidad en SciELO, RedALyC y SCOPUS.Revista interamericana de bibliotecología, 34(2), 187-199.
  31. (31) Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
  32. (32) Nunamaker, J. F., Reinig, B. A., & Briggs, R. O. (2009). Principles for effective virtual teamwork. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1145/1498765.1498797
  33. (33) Korzynski, P. (2013). Online social networks and leadership: Implications of a new online working environment for leadership. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 975-994. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2013-0173
  34. (34) Purvanova, R. K., & Bono, J. E. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004
  35. (35) Qureshi, S., & Vogel, D. (2001). Adaptiveness in virtual teams: Organisational challenges and research directions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008756811139
  36. (36) Rivière, C. (2004). La spécificité française de la construction sociologique du concept de sociabilité. Réseaux, (123), 207-231.
  37. (37) Robey, D., Khoo, H. M., & Powers, C. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. Technical communication, 47(1), 51-66.
  38. (38) Rincón, Y. y Zambrano, E. (2008). Equipos de trabajo virtual: los desafíos del trabajo compartido a distancia. Negotium: revista de ciencias gerenciales, 4(11), 104-119.
  39. (39) Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Analyzing the scientific evolution and impact of e-Participation research in JCR journals using science mapping. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 111-119.
  40. (40) Rohwer, E., Kordsmeyer, A. C., Harth, V., & Mache, S. (2020). Boundarylessness and sleep quality among virtual team members–a pilot study from Germany. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 15(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-020-00281-0
  41. (41) Sarker, S., Saker, S. Nicholson, D. B., & Joshi, K. D. (2005). Knowledge transfer in virtual systems development teams: An exploratory study of four key enablers. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 48(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2005.849650
  42. (42) Simmel, G. (2002). Sobre la individualidad y las formas sociales. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
  43. (43) Terán-Yépez, E., Marín-Carrillo, G. M., Casado-Belmonte, M., & Capobianco-Uriarte, M. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119742
  44. (44) Turel, O., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Should I e-collaborate with this group? A multilevel model of usage intentions. Information & Management, 48(1), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.12.004
  45. (45) Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  46. (46) Walvoord, A. A., Redden, E. R., Elliott, L. R., & Coovert, M. D. (2008). Empowering followers in virtual teams: Guiding principles from theory and practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1884-1906.
  47. (47) Wakefield, R. L., Leidner, D. E., & Garrison, G. (2008). Research note—a model of conflict, leadership, and performance in virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 434-455. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0149
  48. (48) Warkentin, M., & Beranek, P. M. (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal, 9(4), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.1999.00065.x
  49. (49) Workman, M. (2007). The proximal‐virtual team continuum: A study of performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 794-801. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20545

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.