Consumo intertemporal e ciclo de vida em um contexto de pandemia: uma aproximação experimental

Autores

Palavras-chave:

poupança, comportamento econômico, consumidor, método experimental, teoria da decisão

Resumo

A pandemia de Covid-19 gerou incerteza entre os consumidores, um abrandamento do consumo e um aumento da poupança agregada em todo o mundo; os dados microeconómicos mostraram uma tendência para a despoupança e o consumo crescente. Estas variações motivam questões sobre as consequências do confinamento no consumo intertemporal, ao mesmo tempo que permitem fornecer novas evidências empíricas sobre modelos de ciclo de vida nas suas versões padrão ou neoclássica e comportamental. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar experimentalmente padrões de consumo intertemporais com base nos postulados de ambos os modelos de ciclo de vida. Para o efeito, foi proposto um exercício experimental de simulação de compras online de produtos básicos, no qual participaram 210 consumidores e foram submetidos a tratamentos que incluíram uma linha de base, cenários de aumento de rendimento e cenários de retirada sem rendimento. Os resultados permitiram verificar a existência de respostas consistentes com o modelo comportamental em 85% dos casos e com o modelo padrão para os restantes 15%, ou seja, as tendências para suavizar o consumo e aumentar a poupança foram minoria no grupo avaliado e O contexto de confinamento não se traduziu em comportamentos de consumo intertemporais mais autocontrolados.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

, Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano

Doutor em Psicologia pela Universidad Nacional de Colombia, professor da Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano. ORCID: 0000-0001-8839-5462. E-mail: cmpico@poligran.edu.co, Bogotá - Colômbia.

, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada

Doutor em Economia pela Universidad de Chile, professor associado da Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, ORCID: 0000-0001-9615-6533. E-mail: luis.sandoval@unimilitar.edu.co, Bogotá - Colômbia.

Referências

(1) Alessie, R. & de Ree, J. (2009). Explaining The Hump In Life Cycle Consumption profiles. De Economist, 157, 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-009-9119-4

(2) Alessie, R. Devereux, M. & Weber, G. (1997). Intertemporal Consumption, Durables and Liquidity Constraints: A Cohort Analysis, European Economic Review, 41(1), 37-59, https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00128-X

(3) Ando, A. & Modigliani, F. (2005). The life cycle hypothesis of saving: aggregate implications and tests. En F. Modigliani. (Ed.), The collected papers of Franco Modigliani. (pp. 62-78). MIT Press.

(4) Arslan, Y. Guler, B. & Taskin, T. (2021). Price search, consumption inequality and expenditure inequality over the life-cycle. International Economic Review, 62(1), 295-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12488

(5) Attanasio, O & Borella, M. (2006). Stochastic Components of Individual Consumption: A Time Series Analysis of Grouped Data. National Bureau of Economic Research, 12456, 1-48, https://doi.org/10.3386/w12456

(6) Attanasio, O. & Weber, G. (2010). Consumption and Saving: Models of Intertemporal Allocation and Their Implications for Public Policy. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(3), 693-751.

(7) Bancolombia. (2021). Comportamiento del gasto en los hogares: crecimiento durante 2021. Bancolombia. https://www.bancolombia.com/wps/portal/negocios/actualizate/perspectivas-economicas/comportamiento-gasto-hogares-2021.

(8) Binswanger, J. (2012). Life cycle saving: Insights from the perspective of bounded rationality. European Economic Review, 56(3), 605-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.01.003

(9) Carbone, E. & Infante, G. (2014). Comparing behavior under risk and under ambiguity in a lifecycle experiment. Theory and Decision, 77, 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-014-9443-2

(10) Carbone, E. & Infante, G. (2015). Are groups better planners than individuals? An experimental análisis. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.04.006

(11) Carroll, C. (1997). Buffer-stock saving and the life-cycle/permanent income. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555109

(12) Castañeda, M. y Hernández, M. (2021). El nuevo consumidor colombiano: cambios y tendencias. BBVA. https://acortar.link/udXBHs

(13) Deaton, A. & Paxton, C. (1994). Intertemporal Choice and Inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 102(3), 437-467. https://doi.org/10.1086/261941

(14) Deaton, A. (1991). Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica, 59(5), 1221-1248. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938366

(15) Deaton, A. (2005). Franco Modigliani and the Life Cycle Theory of Consumption. SSRN.

(16) DiCrosta, A., Ceccato, I., Marchetti, D., La Malva, P., Maiella, R., Cannito, L., Cipi, M., Mammarella, N., Palumbo, R., Verrocchio, M., Palumbo, R. & Di Domenico, A. (2021). Psychological factors and consumer behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 16(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256095

(17) García, C. (2018). Ecuaciones de Euler del consumo: Recorrido histórico, evidencia empírica, y una interpretación de su persistencia en la macroeconomía moderna [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad del Valle]. Repositorio institucional. https://bibliotecadigital.univalle.edu.co/bitstream/10893/11243/1/3340-0582398-E.pdf

(18) Graham, F. & Isaac, A. (2002). The behavioral life-cycle theory of consumer behavior: survey evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(4), 391-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00242-6

(19) Green, L., Fry, A. & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5(1), 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.1994.tb00610.x

(20) Guglielminetti, E. & Rondinelli, C. (2021). Consumption and saving patterns in Italy during Covid-19. Questioni di Economia e Finanza, (620), 5-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891608

(21) Jin, X., Zhao, Y., Song, W. & Zhao, T. (2021). Save for Safe: Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Consumers’ Saving and Spending Behavior in China. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636859

(22) Jørgensen, T. (2016). Euler equation estimation: Children and credit constraints. Quantitative Economics, 7, 935-968. https://doi.org/10.3982/QE492

(23) Keynes, J.M. (1965). Teoría general de la ocupación, el interés y el dinero (E. Hornedo, Trad., Séptima Edición) Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Trabajo original publicado en 1936).

(24) Koehler, D., Langstaff, J. & Liu, W.Q. (2015). A simulated financial savings task for studying consumption and retirement decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 46, 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.004

(25) Laibson, D. & Harris, C. (2001). Dynamic choices of hyperbolic consumers. Econometrica, 69(4), 443-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00225

(26) Lera, F. (1996). Teorías macroeconómicas explicativas del ahorro de las economías domésticas: situación actual de debate. Are assets fungible?: Testing the behavioral theory of life-cycle savings. Cuadernos de economía, 24, 91-117.

(27) Levin, L. (1998). Are assets fungible?: Testing the behavioral theory of life-cycle savings. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 36(1), 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00070-5

(28) Menger, C. (2007). Principles of political economy. Ludwig Von Mises Institute. https://cdn.mises.org/Principles%20of%20Economics_5.pdf

(29) Modigliani, F. y Brumberg, R. (1954). Utility analysis and the consumption function: an interpretation of cross-section data. En K. Kurihara. (Ed.), Post- Keynesian Economic (pp. 388–436). Rutgers University Press.

(30) Pico, C. (2021). La teoría económica y el modelo de perspectiva conductual: una aproximación experimental al efecto de los ingresos y precios sobre la elección del consumidor [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. Repositorio Institucional UNAL . https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80026

(31) Quintana-Domeque, C. & Wohlfart, J. (2016). “Relative concerns for consumption at the top”: An intertemporal analysis for the UK. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 129, 172-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.06.005

(32) Shefrin, H. & Thaler, R. (1988). The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis. Economic inquiry, 26(4) , 609-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01520.x

(33) Srivastava, R. & Bhanot, S. (2022). Study on the impact of COVID‐19 on the purchase and mental behaviour of Indian consumers during lockdown. International Social Science Journal, 72(244), 437-459. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fissj.12329

(34) Statman, M. (2017). Standard and Behavioral Life-Cycle Theories and Public Policy . The Journal of Retirement, 5(2), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2017.5.2.012

(35) Thaler, R. (2008). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 27(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0330

(36) Tobin, J. (1967). Life-cycle saving and balanced growth. En W. Fellner. (Ed.), Ten Economic Essays in the Tradition of Irving Fisher (pp. 231-256). Wiley.

(37) Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683

(38) White, B. B. (1978). Empirical tests of the life cycle hypothesis. The American Economic Review, 68(4), 547-560.

Publicado

2024-07-01

Como Citar

Pico Bonilla, C. M., & Sandoval Garrido, L. E. (2024). Consumo intertemporal e ciclo de vida em um contexto de pandemia: uma aproximação experimental. Tendencias, 25(2), 57–85. Recuperado de https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rtend/article/view/8815