Estado da arte do desempenho acadêmico no ensino medio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22267/rhec.141717.44Palavras-chave:
educação, fator colégio, fator estudante, estes padronizados, desempenho acadêmicoResumo
Este documento mostra o Estado da arte dos determinantes do rendimento escolar no ensino medio, tendo em conta às principais pesquisas realizadas, tanto a nível nacional como internacionalmente, sobres os fatores que influenciam o desempenho escolar dos estudantes. Com este trabalho, se procura estabelecer as principais variáveis, tanto na Colômbia e em alguns lugares do mundo, afetando o desempenho acadêmico dos estudantes. Este documento está organizado em duas sessões, determinantes a nível mundial e determinantes a nível colombiano; cada sessão clasifica as pesquisas de acordó a os fatores do estudante, da escola e das características organizacionais e políticas. Embora haja muitas pesquisas sobre o tema, ainda não se chegou a um consenso geral sobre os fatores determinantes no desempenho acadêmico, porque na realidade são muitas as características do indivíduo, a escola ou o sistema que se relacionam uns com os outros de forma diferente e podem afetar o desempenho acadêmico.
Downloads
Referências
Angrist, Joshua D. y Alan B. Krueger. Does Compulsory Schooling Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings? En: Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 106, No. 4, (nov., 1991): 979-1014.
Ballou, Dalle y Michael Podgursky. Teacher Recruitment and Retention in Public and Private Schools. En: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Vol. 17, No. 3 (verano, 1998): 393-417.
Berlinski, Samuel; Sebastián Galiani y Paul Gertler. The Effect of Pre-primary Education on Primary-school Performance. Londres: Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2006 (Documentos de trabajo W06/04).
Caro, Blanca Lilia. Factores asociados al logro académico de los alumnos de 3° y 5° de primaria de Bogotá. Coyuntura Social. Fedesarrollo. No. 22, (may., 2000): 65-80.
Chica, Sandra Milena; Diana Maritza Galvis y Andrés Ramírez Hassan. Determinantes del rendimiento académico en Colombia. Pruebas ICFES – Saber 11º, 2009. En: Revista Universidad EAFIT. Vol. 46. No. 160 (2010): 48-72.
Clotfelter, Charles T.; Helen F. Ladd y Jacob L. Vigdor. How and Why do Teacher Credentials Matter for Student Achievement? Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010 (Documento de trabajo NBER 12828).
Coleman, James S. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1966.
Cox, Donald y Emmanuel Jiménez. The Relative Effectiveness of Private and Public Schools: Evidence from two Developing Countries. En: The Journal of Development Economics. Vol. 34, No. 1-2 (1991): 99-121.
Cunha, Flavio; James J. Heckman; Lance Lochner y Dimitry V. Masterov. Interpreting the Evidence on Life Cycle Skill Formation. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005 (Documento de trabajo NBER 11331).
Darling-Hammond, Linda. Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence. En: Education Policy Analysis Archives. Vol. 8. No. 1, (en., 2000).
Diamond, Jared M. Guns, germs, and steel: the fates of human societies. Los Angeles: Debate Editorial, 1997.
Easterly, William. How much do distortions affect growth? En: Journal of Monetary Economics. Vol. 32. No. 2, (1993): 187-212.
Fertig, Michael y Christoph M. Schmidt. The Role of Background Factors for Reading Literacy: Straight National Scores in the PISA 2000 Study. En: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) (ag., 2002) (Documento para discussion 545).
Filmer, Deon y Gunnar S. Eskeland. Autonomy, Participation, and Learning in Argentine Schools: Findings, and Their Implications for Decentralization. Washington, DC: Banco Mundial, 2002 (Documento de trabajo 2766).
Fuchs, Thomas y Ludger Wößmann. What Accounts for International Differences in Student Performance? A Re-examination using PISA Data. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00181-006-0087-0
Galiani, Sebastian; Paul J. Gertler y Ernesto Schargrodsky. School Decentralization: helping the Good Get Better, but Leaving the Poor Behind. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272708000923
Gaviria, Alejandro y Jorge Hugo Barrientos. Determinantes de la calidad de la educación en Colombia. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación/Dirección de Estudios Económicos, 2001 (Documento 159).
González Pérez, Alicia. Políticas educativas en Corea del Sur: buenas prácticas TIC en la sociedad del conocimiento”. En: Análisis. Año 14, No. 40, (ab., 2011): 75-90.
González, Pablo; Alejandra Mizala y Pilar Romaguera. Vouchers, inequalities and the chilean experience, http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/Voucher_ChileOP94.pdf
Hanushek, Eric A. The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools. En: Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 24, No. 3, (sept., 1986): 1141-1177.
Hanushek, Eric A. y Javier A. Luque. Efficiency and Equity in Schools around the World. En: Economics of Education Review, Elsevier. Vol. 22 (5), (oct., 2003): 481-502.
Hanushek, Eric A. y Wößmann, L. Education quality and economic growth. Washington D.C.: Banco Mundial, 2007.
Heckman, James J.; Alan B. Krueger y Pedro Carneiro. Inequality in America: What Role for Human Capital Policies? Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003.
Hedges, Larry V.; Richard D. Laine y Rob Greenwald. Does Money Matter? A Meta-analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes. En: Educational Researcher. Vol. 23. No. 3, (ab., 1994): 5-14.
Hepp K., Pedro; Enrique Hinostroza S.; Ernesto Laval M. y Lucio Rehbein. Technology in Schools: Education, ICT, and the Knowledge Society. Washington, DC: Human Development Network, Banco Mundial, 2004.
Hoxby, Caroline M. Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers? En: The American Economic Review. Vol. 90, No. 5, (dic., 2000): 1209-1238.
Hsieh, Chang-Tai y Miguel Urquiola. When schools compete, how do they compete? An assessment of Chile’s nationwide school voucher program (nov., 2004), http://www.columbia.edu/~msu2101/HsiehUrquiola%282004%29.pdf.
King, Elizabeth M. y Berk Özler. What’s decentralization got to do with learning? Endogenous school quality and student performance in Nicaragua, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.17.6332&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
López Mera, Silvio Fernando. El efecto colegio en Colombia: tres décadas de estudio. En: Revista Equidad y Desarrollo. No. 14, (2010): 85-101.
Lucas, Jr., Robert E. On the Mechanics of Economic Development. En: Journal of Monetary Economics. No. 22, (1988): 3-42.
McEwan, Patrick J. The indigenous test score gap in Bolivia and Chile. En: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 54. No. 1 (2004):157-90, http://academics.wellesley.edu/Economics/mcewan/PDF/indigenous.pdf.
Mina Calvo, Alejandro. Factores asociados al logro educativo a nivel municipal. Bogotá: Universidad de Los Andes, 2004 (Tesis de Maestría)
Muñoz Repiso, Mercedes y F. Javier Murillo. Un balance provisional sobre la calidad de la educación. Eficacia escolar y mejora de la escuela. En: Organización y Gestión Educativa. Vol. 9, No. 4 (2004). [En: REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, http://www.rinace.net/reice/numeros/arts/vol8num2/art10.pdf: 177-186].
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Are Students Ready for a Technology-Rich World? What PISA studies tell us. París: OECD, 2006. https://goo.su/fLYa
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Knowledge and skills for life: first results from PISA 2000. París: OCDE, 2001. https://goo.su/Dy1x2
Piñeros Jiménez, Luis Jaime y Alberto Rodríguez Pinzón. Los insumos escolares en la educación secundaria y su efecto sobre el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes: Un estudio en Colombia. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank/Latin America and the Caribbean Region/Department of Human Development, 1998.
Rebelo, Sergio. Long-Run policy analysis and long-run growth. En: The Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 99, No. 3 (jun., 1991): 500-521.
Romer, Paul M. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. En: The Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 94, No. 5 (oct., 1986): 1002-1037.
Sanders, W., y Rivers, J. Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Student Academic Achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee/Value-Added Research and Assessment Center, 1996, http://www.cgp.upenn.edu/pdf/Sanders_Rivers-TVASS_teacher%20effects.pdf.
Stein, Ernesto H.; Mariano Tommasi, Koldo Echebarría, Eduardo Lora y J. Mark Payne. The politics of policies: economic and social progress in Latin America. Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, 2006.
Vaillant, Denise. Las políticas TIC en los sistemas educativos de América Latina: Caso Uruguay. Buenos Aires: Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia (UNICEF), 2013.
Vegas, Emiliana y Jenny Petrow. Incrementar el aprendizaje estudiantil en América Latina. Washington D.C.: Banco Mundial, 2008.
Willms, J. Douglas y Marie-Andree Somers. Family, Classroom, and School Effects on Children’s Educational Outcomes in Latin America. En: School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Vol. 12, No. 4, (dic., 2001): 409-445.
Woessmann, Ludger y Thomas Fuchs. Families, schools, and primary-school learning: evidence for Argentina and Colombia in an international perspective. Washington, DC: Banco Mundial, 2005 (Documento de trabajo 3537).
Wößmann, Ludger. Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: the international evidence”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 65. No. 2, (may., 2003): 117-170.
Wolff, Laurence; Juan Carlos Navarro y Pablo González (eds.). Private education and public policy in Latin America. Washington, DC: Partnership for Educational Revitalization in the Americas (PREAL), 2003.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Historia de la Educación Colombiana
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
